Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Foster mom imperfect but loving
Testimony points to battle with CFS
I've had a long and somewhat tumultuous relationship with Kim Edwards, one that began in our mutual desire to have the true story of Phoenix Sinclair told. The low point in my dealings with Phoenix's former foster mother came in 2011, when I wrote a column that revealed the child lay in a grave unmarked except for a small, numbered, concrete disk.
Readers responded, as readers do, quickly and compassionately. Teddy bears, flowers and balloons were dropped off at the cemetery. A local company offered a free headstone.
Related Items
Edwards shot me this email: "what the hell is wrong with you !lady i hoper spomeone hurts you as you have hurt us you stiupid bitch thatnks for creating the shrine we did not want ! WHAT BUSINESS IT IT OF YOURS"
It was signed "peace to you," which is considerably more polite than my usual hate mail. She ordered the gravesite tributes removed. And that was that for us, until the inquiry into the little girl's death began. Edwards has attended faithfully, bearing witness to the testimony of others and waiting for a chance to give her version of truth.
What the inquiry has revealed so far is there are two child-welfare systems in this province. The first exists in officialdom, with social workers and supervisors paid to look after children in distress with supposed speed and efficiency. The second is informal and shadowy, guided by the unwritten rule that children must be protected from CFS interference at all cost.
Edwards belongs to the second camp. As she testified Wednesday at the inquiry, her contempt for CFS filled the room like a noxious gas. She said she only had contact with CFS twice in the two years Phoenix lived with her full time. One was a home visit from CFS worker Stan Williams, the second essentially a drive-by when Williams returned the child.
There is all sorts of CFS documentation that says workers called her, visited the home, sent her letters. She denied it all. The only social worker I met with was Stan Williams, she said repeatedly, and I met with him twice.
Her animosity toward the official child-welfare system resurfaced as she recalled being told by Williams she might not keep Phoenix because her home wasn't "culturally appropriate." That meant, in CFS-speak, she was not aboriginal and Phoenix was.
It's plain Edwards loved the little girl desperately, cared for her like a mother and helped provide the only home the child ever knew. You can't question her dedication to Phoenix and her unflagging, sometimes misplaced faith in Steve Sinclair, the girl's father. Edwards is the one who remembers first steps and words, talks with pride of how early Phoenix spoke in sentence fragments and recalls what a trouper the toddler was. There was nothing she wouldn't have done for Phoenix.
Edwards had her own experiences with CFS. When she was 17, she gave birth to her first child. That little girl was apprehended for a year because, Edwards said, she was being abused by her partner. She bitterly said CFS took her baby but left her in danger. She testified the foster mother bent the rules and let Edwards visit her newborn more often than the mandated one hour a week. The worker was fired for doing so, she said. A file on her second child was opened and closed in a single day because there had been a report of violence committed by the same ex-partner.
When Edwards and former husband Rohan Stephenson applied to become a CFS "place of safety" in July 2003, Edwards did not disclose her previous CFS involvement.
"It wasn't because I was trying to hide it," she testified. "I forgot about that incident with (her daughter)."
It's a big thing to forget, but standard procedure, as Stephenson testified, was to tell CFS nothing. Lying is fair game if you get to keep the child. And they managed, even as she and Stephenson separated and she "couch surfed" while he remained in the family house with Phoenix and the rest of their children. They provided a semblance of family life to a girl whose parents either wouldn't or couldn't.
Kim Edwards can be profane, threatening and sometimes seem irrational. But she loved Phoenix without reservation. That's a flash of brightness for this dreary inquiry.
lindor.reynolds@freepress.mb.ca
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 13, 2012 A3
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 50 articles for this week)
At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
06/18/2013 1:00 AM 0I turn 55 this week.
I'd never considered the possibility of the palindrome or, if I had, I attached the word ...
About Lindor Reynolds
National Newspaper Award winner Lindor Reynolds began work at the Free Press as a 17-year-old proofreader. It was a rough introduction to the news business.
Many years later, armed with a university education and a portfolio of published work, she was hired as a Free Press columnist. During her 20-plus years on the job she has written for every section in the paper, with the exception of Business. She’ll get around to them some day.
Lindor has received considerable recognition for her writing. Her awards include the Will Rogers Humanitarian Award, the National Society of Newspaper Columnists’ general interest award and the North American Travel Journalists Association top prize.
Her work on Internet luring led to an amendment to the Criminal Code of Canada and her coverage of the child welfare system prompted a change to Manitoba Child and Family Services Act to make the safety of children paramount.
She has earned three citations of merit for the Michener Award for Meritorious Public Service in Journalism and has been awarded a Distinguished Alumni commendation from the University of Winnipeg. Lindor was also named a YMCA/YWCA Woman of Distinction.
She is married with four daughters. If her house was on fire and the kids and dog were safe, she’d grab her passport.
lindor.reynolds@freepress.mb.ca
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Blue offence must make teams pay for blitzing Buck
- Mack, Burke give each other room to do their jobs
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Boyfriend's right; you should wait
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Bark in the park more than a lark
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Fiasco fixers
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- What a knockout!
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Your new 'friends' have unlocked a mystery
- Discovering your wife's kinky behaviour isn't an invitation to join the party
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Ground control to Major Chris
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Fiasco fixers
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Katz bogeys again
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Take a walk in the park to fight prostate cancer
- Psychics pull off a little magic
- Fiasco fixers
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- Helping others despite the cost
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- St. Norbert sees condo boom
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Lessons learned in 4-H last a lifetime
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Ground control to Major Chris
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.