Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
He was curiously incurious; he was Phoenix's last chance
Christopher Zalevich is the curiously incurious CFS worker who went to Samantha Kematch's apartment in March 2005 to investigate an abuse complaint and left without seeing her daughter, Phoenix Sinclair.
The crisis-response-unit social worker was following up on a telephone tip Kematch was locking Phoenix in her bedroom and possibly abusing her.
Kematch didn't want to let him into her suite. Zalevich accepted Kematch's explanation she was entertaining a friend. He, a colleague and the mother stood in the hallway for a brief chat. He didn't ask if there was another adult living in the home or who had fathered her new baby. He said he wanted to respect Kematch's privacy.
There were no signs of a party he could hear from the hallway, which Zalevich took as a good sign. He told Kematch there had been a complaint about possible abuse and Kematch said she'd shouted at Phoenix a few days earlier and was surprised someone heard her. That admission had nothing to do with the accusation.
She said there was a lock on the bedroom door. He warned her of the danger of locking in a child. His notes don't say whether he asked if Phoenix was ever locked in her room, or locked in her room and left alone.
He didn't ask a second time to enter the apartment, not even when Kematch went back into the apartment to fetch her newborn.
"Samantha returned into her apartment and brought (the baby) into the hallway. (The baby) appeared to be a content, healthy, clean and well-dressed baby. She was smiling and comfortable with Samantha."
Samantha Kematch, in the words of the woman who made the allegation, had a CFS file "a mile long or a metre deep." Zalevich would have known this had he read her file, something he claims he did as part of his normal practice. He was similarly ignorant that Karl "Wes" McKay was Kematch's common-law partner, and the father of the baby Kematch was holding in her hallway. If he'd known that, and if he'd looked him up, he would have learned McKay had a history of violence toward his partners and was not to be trusted around children.
Zalevich left the building satisfied, and recommended the file be closed. He testified he viewed the baby as "proxy" for Phoenix. If Kematch was treating the baby well, odds were good she treated her five-year-old the same way.
Zalevich is essentially a self-taught social worker. His university degree is in human ecology. When he started his job, he testified, he received no formal training in child welfare. He worked as both an abuse intake worker and crisis-response worker, again without formal training for either role. After 2001, he got "core competency" training and learned things informally from his co-workers, he testified.
He finally got training in child-welfare standards somewhere in 2007 or 2008, he said. That was two or three years too late. Under cross-examination, Zalevich said he didn't push to see Phoenix because "it wasn't agency standard."
How curiously incurious must he be not to put his foot in the door, cross the threshold and actually look at the child? In cross-examination, Jeff Gindin asked if it was true Zalevich didn't know any more about Phoenix and her possible abuse when he left as he did when he took the file.
"You could say that," he answered, and it would be true.
A report into the youngster's death revealed there was no indication she'd been seen by any social worker since Jan. 21, 2004. Kematch and McKay scuttled off to Fisher River with their children a couple of months later.
He is still a crisis-response-unit worker. Curiously, his failure on the Phoenix file wasn't enough have him moved to a less demanding job. Maybe it's context. He's not much worse than many others who have testified. It's just that he was Phoenix's last chance.
lindor.reynolds@freepress.mb.ca
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 16, 2013 A5
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 5 articles for today)
My arm tattoo has me thinking
1:00 AM 0I have a swell new tattoo on my right arm.
Prepare to be extremely jealous, because it artfully depicts a pink ...
About Lindor Reynolds
National Newspaper Award winner Lindor Reynolds began work at the Free Press as a 17-year-old proofreader. It was a rough introduction to the news business.
Many years later, armed with a university education and a portfolio of published work, she was hired as a Free Press columnist. During her 20-plus years on the job she has written for every section in the paper, with the exception of Business. She’ll get around to them some day.
Lindor has received considerable recognition for her writing. Her awards include the Will Rogers Humanitarian Award, the National Society of Newspaper Columnists’ general interest award and the North American Travel Journalists Association top prize.
Her work on Internet luring led to an amendment to the Criminal Code of Canada and her coverage of the child welfare system prompted a change to Manitoba Child and Family Services Act to make the safety of children paramount.
She has earned three citations of merit for the Michener Award for Meritorious Public Service in Journalism and has been awarded a Distinguished Alumni commendation from the University of Winnipeg. Lindor was also named a YMCA/YWCA Woman of Distinction.
She is married with four daughters. If her house was on fire and the kids and dog were safe, she’d grab her passport.
lindor.reynolds@freepress.mb.ca
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Next time, see if she'll let you wear your jersey
- Bogosian too important an asset to let slip away
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- My arm tattoo has me thinking
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Blue offence must make teams pay for blitzing Buck
- Mack, Burke give each other room to do their jobs
- Christmas treat good any time of year
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Fiasco fixers
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- What a knockout!
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Discovering your wife's kinky behaviour isn't an invitation to join the party
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- UFC 161 a smash success
- Next time, see if she'll let you wear your jersey
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Ground control to Major Chris
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Fiasco fixers
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Whether sweet or savoury, delicious is spelled 'nalysnyky'
- Bogosian too important an asset to let slip away
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Take a walk in the park to fight prostate cancer
- Psychics pull off a little magic
- Fiasco fixers
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- Helping others despite the cost
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- St. Norbert sees condo boom
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Lessons learned in 4-H last a lifetime
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Ground control to Major Chris
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.