Columnists

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Native-education logjam helps no one

New formula for funding essential step

Posted: 12/3/2012 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs Grand Chief Derek Nepinak

OTTAWA -- Last year at this time, there was a rare emotion swirling between the federal government and Canada's First Nations.

Hope.

Both the government and many First Nations leaders felt the stars were aligning so the dismal education system most First Nations people were forced to endure would finally be improved.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Assembly of First Nations had jointly declared education to be a priority. An expert panel appointed by Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan and a Senate committee studying native education were finishing their work, and ultimately both released reports calling for better funding and a First Nations Education Act to enshrine certain principles of learning and standards.

Duncan committed to a First Nations Education Act being in place by September 2014.

There was $275 million over three years in the 2012 budget for new reserve schools and early-learning programs.

With all of this, the feeling was maybe, just maybe, the problems facing education on reserves would be addressed.

But in recent months, that hope has faded, replaced with resentment, anger and that old staple, mistrust. The level of that anger will be front and centre this week as chiefs meet in Gatineau, Que., for a special assembly.

The wheels have been slowly coming off the bus over the last year as First Nations leaders perceive repeated attacks on their independence and treaty rights -- from funding cuts to chiefs organizations that are often critical of the government to a number of bills affecting First Nations chiefs say they were not properly consulted about.

In October, Ottawa suddenly issued a press release claiming reserve schools were not underfunded, even though both the Senate committee and expert panel said the opposite. It drove a stake through the hope that Ottawa might be willing to inject some serious cash to improve reserve schools.

Around the same time, the Assembly of First Nations voted to reject a federal First Nations Education Act before it even got started, believing Ottawa was going to unilaterally create legislation that did not properly consult chiefs and other First Nations leaders, and that would be a top-down approach that didn't take into account unique needs in different parts of the country.

Chiefs in Ontario and Manitoba have also made similar rejections in recent weeks.

The ill will toward such legislation -- which a year ago was being touted as a potential saviour for the country's First Nations children -- is so strong Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs Grand Chief Derek Nepinak said Friday if anyone at the assembly this week tries to get the idea back on the table "it would be a very big mistake."

The chasm between Ottawa and First Nations appears to be so big Nepinak is ready to wash his hands of this government altogether and start working toward unseating it in 2015.

But if one thing is clear -- kids can't wait until 2015 or longer. When some reserves see fewer than three in 10 of their kids graduate from high school, when education is a critical component for the health and well-being of children, and for the health and well-being of our future economy, we need action now.

And both sides need to get back at it.

Ottawa needs to admit the only reason it can say it spends more per pupil on aboriginal education is because of the tuition it pays for some reserve kids to attend off-reserve schools. That on-reserve schools get less than $7,000 per pupil in funding, far below the $10,500 average for off-reserve schools. A new formula for funding on-reserve education would go a long way to getting this process back on track.

But Ottawa can't do it alone.

First Nations leaders need to be willing to talk. Walking away from the development of a First Nations Education Act before the process has even really started benefits nobody.

mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 3, 2012 A7

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Columnists

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.