Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 05/7/2014 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
What does Manitoba Hydro have to do to be refused an environmental licence for its new generating station?
This is the overarching question left hanging in the air after reviewing a decision by Manitoba's Clean Environment Commission -- obtained by the Free Press -- to issue a licence to Hydro for the Keeyask generating station in northern Manitoba.
In short, the CEC found there is likely to be "significant cumulative effect" on lake sturgeon and woodland caribou from the construction and operation of the $6.5-billion dam on the Nelson River, and measures to be undertaken by Hydro and its First Nation partners -- the so-called Keeyask Hydropower Limited Partnership (KHLP) -- while promising, are more experimental than anything else at this point.
Of greater concern is a decision by the CEC to ignore a condition it laid down in a previous licensing decision.
In its approval for the Bipole III transmission line, the CEC advised no further dam development should be undertaken on the Nelson River without a comprehensive Regional Cumulative Effects Study (RCES) of all past and future hydro projects. This ensures that in considering licensing for any single dam, the commission has information about the cumulative impact of all Manitoba Hydro generating stations.
Although the commission still wants that to happen, it is now prepared to issue a licence for Keeyask without having this important data in hand.
The CEC decision is not without its merits, however.
For the first time ever in an environmental licensing process, traditional aboriginal knowledge of the land and waterways was included as evidence in deliberations.
The CEC also showed its capacity for innovation by performing what was in essence four separate environmental assessments on four distinct issues: impact on lake sturgeon; impact on caribou; impact of methylmercury contamination; and impact of workers going in and out of environmentally sensitive land.
The CEC has also made numerous demands on the Keeyask partnership to continue studying, mitigating, remediating and repairing the damage done from this project. Lamentably, however, with a cumulative study the CEC does not know for sure whether any of these measures will be successful.
This is merely the latest example of the regulatory oddity that is the CEC. Although it operates at a somewhat arm's-length from government, its decisions are neither completely independent nor binding. In fact, all CEC orders must be stamped by a cabinet minister before being enacted. That means environmental regulation in Manitoba is conducted purely at the pleasure of the government of the day.
In that context, it seems obvious it was a foregone conclusion a licence would be issued for Keeyask. The NDP government remains bullish about expanding its network of northern generating stations, despite growing evidence they are neither needed nor particularly cost-effective.
Hydro certainly has acted all along as if a licence was a done deal. The utility has, by its own numbers, already spent nearly $1 billion on Keeyask.
The money was used to build a road into the dam site, train workers and otherwise ready the site for full construction.
Then, in the middle of hearings, Hydro awarded a general contract for dam construction. That is not the actions of a Crown corporation concerned about getting environmental approval.
It is important to note it is not the CEC's mandate to find a plan for dam construction that had no environmental impact. A dam of this magnitude will have some negative consequences.
The CEC process was to find the best way, with the least amount of environmental disturbance, to build this project.
Has the CEC succeeded in that goal?
We won't know for years, and even then we're not sure Hydro will feel compelled to make the results of any future cumulative studies public.
Even some of the most strident critics of Hydro's environmental policies will be pleased First Nations people, and traditional aboriginal knowledge, have been involved in this process more than ever before. And that those First Nations made a potent, moving case for allowing limited environmental damage in exchange for the possibility of sustainable economic development.
And yet, it's impossible to read the CEC's Keeyask decision and not wish the regulator had insisted a bit more on additional measures to protect sturgeon and caribou, or that a RCES be completed prior to substantive construction on the dam.
Weigh all the pros and cons, and there is only one clear conclusion to draw from this matter: It was not an option for the CEC to refuse to issue a licence for Keeyask. And that is a problem that is, respectively, much larger than the fate of sturgeon and caribou.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 7, 2014 A5
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
A time to reflect on all our blessings
NDP in tough spot for 2015 election
Ensure emotions can handle play date
Two stand out against all other candidates
A doggone happy reunification
Exit a body blow for Selinger
Talkin' 'bout a revolutionary
Earl Grey squares
#Decolonize2014: Boundary-defying exhibitions by indigenous artists help define art in Winnipeg this year
A mommy not required to stick up for husband
Persian, Somali food in short supply in Winnipeg, so this duo is a great discovery
City, Shindico still at odds over expropriation
Time to deal yourself in, Chevy
Return to Dog River so much fun you could spit
Generosity doesn't solve poverty
Hush-hush bar fight leads to fidelity concerns
A pooch's present
Time to deal yourself in, Chevy
Daughter makes her mom proud
Dad feeling dumb after being caught smoking pot
Tolkiening it to the next level
Brace for return of Bellefeuille, Etcheverry
Scandinavian-style spa steaming up Fort Garry
Eggnog Sandwich Cookies
The buddy system can be complicated thing
First fashion boutique on Waterfront
Chronic condition and obesity inspire local woman to join reality show about bodybuilders
Marry who you want, don't invite co-workers
Hutchinson deserves more
Whatever happened to Joe Kapone?
Did he die in vain?
Many queries, few answers in police-HQ probe
Your weekend weather
Watch out for overheated canola, farmers warned
Politicians shouldn't finance reporters
It's all about helping good people