Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 08/2/2014 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
The final report to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada from a series of consumer focus groups it commissioned last year is enlightening, but not because of what it tells us about how domestic customers view this country's agriculture sector.
Rather, it speaks volumes about the people asking the questions.
The final report, titled Modern Agriculture and Agricultural Awareness Focus Groups, was delivered to the department in April, but never publicized. It now sits quietly tucked away in its online archives -- perhaps for good reason.
It reflects a department and an industry that is remarkably out of sync with what is arguably its most important constituency: the Canadian consumer and taxpayer.
You would think a government's agriculture department would be focused primarily on feeding that country's people. According to this report, "AAFC's mandate is to work with farmers and food producers to support the growth and development of the agriculture and agri-food sector by means of policies, programs, research and technology that help producers and food manufacturers succeed in the domestic and global markets."
Toward that end, AAFC awarded a contract worth just under $100,000 to have consultants gauge public perceptions of the industry to help develop a communications strategy emphasizing the sector's importance to the Canadian economy.
"A key priority for AAFC is to communicate the role and importance of the agricultural sector in the lives of Canadians," the report says, noting the sector contributes $100 billion annually to this country's GDP. Canada is the fifth-largest agriculture and agri-food exporter in the world. The sector generates $44 billion in exports and employs 2.1 million Canadians.
The concern is, people don't seem to appreciate that or the fact the sector represents much more than what is grown on the farm.
One question this brings to mind is why this is a government priority. Does it do the same for other industries?
The consultants reported that Canadians are indeed clinging to quaint images of agriculture. "When participants think about the sector there is a tendency to envisage farms, livestock, crops, green pastures, endless wheat fields, and prairie landscapes. This type of imagery reinforces a view of the sector as traditional, rather than modern, progressive and innovative."
And there is a sense that all is not well.
"Recent surveys of the Canadian public have underscored a number of misperceptions about the agricultural sector and a relatively pessimistic public view with respect to its future outlook," the report says, citing "alarmist documentaries and media reports" as the culprits.
What misperceptions are they talking about? The focus groups raised concerns about genetically modified organisms, consolidation in the agricultural sector, encroachment of development on agricultural lands, declining interest among current and future generations in the sector, unsustainable farming practices and keeping food production in pace with global population growth.
Other than perhaps genetically modified organisms, many in agriculture share the same concerns. Are they confused too?
Another "misperception" the authors cite is the belief among many consumers Canada lacks food self-sufficiency, or is at risk of losing it. "Unclear on the facts, there was a tendency among many to conclude that Canada must be a net importer of agricultural goods," the report says.
Well, based on the food people actually eat, they aren't far off. Consider this data from the Hellman's Eat Real, Eat Local campaign:
• Canadians import 53 per cent of their vegetables and 78 per cent of their fruit, including produce types that can be grown domestically.
• Over the past four decades, red-meat imports have risen 600 per cent.
• Over the past 15 years, Canadian food imports rose 160 per cent, while the country's population rose 15 per cent.
• For every apple Canada exports, it imports five.
• In the last half of the 20th century, Ontario paved over 49 per cent its prime farmland to accommodate expansion of the Toronto area.
Canada is undeniably a net exporter of agricultural goods measured in dollars, but consumers look at the food going into their grocery carts. By that measure, Canadian agriculture isn't all that significant.
The challenge for AAFC is to demonstrate how the contents of that grocery cart would change if agriculture in Canada disappeared.
Laura Rance is editor of the Manitoba Co-operator. She can be reached at 204-792-4382 or by email: email@example.com.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 2, 2014 B5
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Write off your friends who broke into cabin
The best man for a problematic position
Benzema does more than score
Love potion No. 9
Fresh out of the box
Scotland stays and questions linger
Sixties Scoop demands an inquiry
Your Weekend Weather
Threesome was hot, but left wife feeling cold
Why not make it a day for Grenache?
Work smarter, not harder
True to Izzy's vision
Sanders thinks he'll get the nod
Maurice has influence, pedigree to make Winnipeg a contender
It will take a brave heart for Scotland to leave the U.K.
Finding purpose is worth far more than money
Avoid threats when dealing with friend about ex
Son needs to get help for troubled girlfriend
Calling all carnivores
Time to act is now
Redrawing the map
New, not necessarily exciting
A fond farewell to my buddy, Dale
There's no mystery here; Messing's new show stinks
You are just a pit stop in life for indifferent lover, so drive on
Bye week should be more flexible
Voters driven to distraction on bus rapid transit
Dragging the river of pain in hopes of closure
Science vs. sentiment
Stress to conceive is killing your relationship
Gut-check time for Bombers
CMHR's future is up to us all
Putting spotlight on all Canada's vulnerable
Corea's adventures continue with new project
I'll sleep with CEOs to aid the homeless
Fest features teen lust, walrus masks and a bit of Boogaloo
Disastrous dinner date potentially dangerous