Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 12/17/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
Movies have been made about the acquisition and revelation of secret information. There have been Mission Impossibles planned to recover it, and it has been the objective of more than one James Bond assignment.
It is the new contraband of the CFL, clouded in secrecy to shield its players from the truth, and with a street value that will only increase as the days go by. It is all about the names that were, and were not on, "the list."
It matters little we are talking about unearthing the names of professional football players and not double agents living undercover around the world -- it is still an important list. It is a list of those protected and left exposed for the expansion draft. It is a list that is said to be kept from the public to "protect" the people on and off of it, and their work relationships -- which makes it worth finding out about.
After Monday's expansion draft, we now know only three of the players who were not protected by the Winnipeg Blue Bombers: Import Miles Wallace and non-imports James Green and Rory Kohlert. What we don't know and what I don't understand, is why the public wasn't privy to the complete list of protected players submitted by the member clubs over a week ago, and therefore, more importantly, the ones left off of it.
When asked about this veil of secrecy at the 2013 Grey Cup, as Vancouver writer Lowell Ullrich recently reported in the Province, commissioner Mark Cohon told the media, "the most important thing is to protect the relationship between players and coaches." Indeed, this is what they intended to do, but it is a very misleading notion.
"Protecting the relationship between players and coaches," is not how the CFL should have explained this omission. They should have been honest about what it really implies, which is the CFL will not be releasing this list, "to prevent some players from being exposed to the truth and reality about their relationships between their coaches and member clubs."
The truth is that, almost to a fault, coaches and organizations blow smoke at their players all day, every day. They want them to think they are indispensable and highly valued components of their football team, even when they are not. They want their players to think they have their back, even when they don't, so they will be motivated and can get the most out of them. The revealing of these protected lists would have done the players a huge favour, but the teams a disservice. It would have interrupted the state of denial so many athletes live in, it would have shown them an honest snapshot of their value to their ball clubs and it would have taught them a quick lesson in the realities of pro sports.
By hiding this list the CFL is shielding their players from the reality of their situations. You know what happens when you shield something from stress? You make it weaker.
This was an opportunity for the CFL to give their players an honest accounting of where they stand with their football teams. This was a chance for the players to see the truth about how their organization really feels about them -- not just what they are told -- and where they are ranked. It might have stung for some and been a surprise for others, but it also would have been vindication for some athletes insecure about their standing, and a wakeup call for others living off the fumes of past performances. This wasn't about "protecting relationships between players and coaches," this was about protecting fragile egos and perpetuating the lies told to naive athletes on a daily basis, lies they have wholly bought into.
Discovering which players were protected and which were not would have been a strong discussion and debating point, and given fans insight into this decision-making process. More importantly, the players could have learned and grown from it. But you know the saying: If you have nothing to hide, you wouldn't be hiding it.
Doug Brown, once a hard-hitting defensive lineman and frequently a hard-hitting columnist, appears Tuesdays in the Free Press.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 17, 2013 D3
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Reason for wanting to see ex just creepy
Learning SimCity's lessons
Let's get to know each other a little bit better
Selinger's foes suck and blow
Your weekend weather
Farm boys and they love it
Final showdown should be bloody good
Trending that caught Doug's eye... heroic animals
Oscar has a woman problem
Daring sexcapades too risky, could ruin reputation
Put your palate to the test
Bounce back after a layoff
Never fear: Coward fare is frothy theatrical fun
Yeah, well, tell us something we don't know
Jones makes it look easy
Mid-term report card
What's in a name? Plenty of mistakes, says Speers, er, Speirs
Insurance policy can be sold to corporation
Manitoba Senate seats sit empty
Tell lover hard truth about unsatisfying weekend
Glimpse of a great motivator
Substance over style
Swede and sour
Friend got a big ego boost telling you about his dates
What would Hillary do?
Outdoor game wasn't a fit
Waiter! Where's my popcorn?
Romantic trip goes off the rails after his admission of marriage
Poking the Patriots inspires them
Heavy promises, light delivery from former Kid in the Hall
Pickled performances a put off for partner
Hockey world taking notice
Ashton in scrap over leadership-vote rules
Tending to robotic baby not exactly child's play
From why Winterpeg to why not?
Lewd statement opening salvo in flirtation game