Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Seek good advice on beneficiary designations
Last week, we talked about some of the advantages and the cautions when using joint title designations on properties or investments, as an estate planning tool.
Today, we will drill down into beneficiary elections, focusing on locked-in retirement accounts, life income funds and insurance company segregated investment funds.
Thanks to Christine Van Cauwenberghe of Investors Group, who recently wrote a scholarly article on this topic in the journal of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP).
Remember that registered accounts include RRSPs (registered retirement savings plan) and RRIFs (registered retirement income fund). These plans all allow you to name a beneficiary to receive the funds on your death.
As well, the RRIF allows you to name a "successor annuitant", which would be a person who would continue to receive the payments you were receiving from the RRIF prior to your passing.
Any such beneficiary designations allow these assets to pass outside of your estate. This means that they avoid probate, but do not necessarily go to the same people you have named in your will.
This just means you want to make sure your wishes are clear and consistent in both documents.
For example, if it was your intention to leave all of your estate to your children, you would name them in your will to receive the residue of your estate. However, if you named your spouse or some other person as beneficiary of your RRSP or RRIF, obviously those assets would go a different direction than the assets that formed part of your estate.
In today's column, we are ignoring tax consequences. Registered assets left to a spouse are not taxed on the death of the first spouse. Registered assets left to any other beneficiary are taxed to the estate in the year of death (except with disabled dependent beneficiaries).
Life insurance policies usually pass by way of beneficiary election, and similar care must be taken in consistency and purpose. However, the death benefits are paid tax-free when left to an individual, so less concern there.
There is a subset of registered accounts known as locked-in plans. These are made up of money that was transferred from a previous pension plan, and are therefore covered by more restrictive rules.
The RRSP equivalent locked-in plan is called a LIRA (locked-in retirement account) or locked-in RRSP, and the RRIF equivalents are called LIF (life income fund) or LRIF (locked-in retirement income fund).
Generally, the spouse or common-law partner must be named as beneficiary on locked-in plans, consistent with pension legislation. Naming a child as beneficiary where a spouse exists will usually be ignored in favour of the spouse. This could happen when a widow or widower names children, and then starts a new spousal relationship and neglects to change the previous beneficiary designation.
Provincial law is variable and tricky on whether or not the spouse can waive rights, and the spouse can always cancel such a waiver.
The spouse is usually first choice from a tax perspective, to avoid the entire registered account value being added to the income of the deceased person in the year of death.
Segregated funds are investment funds issued by insurance companies. Unlike conventional mutual funds, these allow a beneficiary designation, which means the assets bypass the estate, and are protected from creditors of the deceased or the estate.
TFSA accounts allow beneficiary elections, and if a spouse or common law partner (known as a "survivor" in this context) is named as "successor holder", the amount can be added to the survivor's TFSA without affecting contribution room -- an "exempt contribution". A form RC 240 must be filed. Other beneficiaries simply receive the money that was in the TFSA into their own hands (outside their TFSA).
I am going to ask you two favours about your estate planning -- please check this weekend to see whether everything is the way you want it, and get good advice on your plan and your beneficiary designations.
Oh, one more thing, unrelated... please don't overspend on Christmas presents. Arrange to give your time as a substitute.
Priceless.
-- -- --
Dollars and Sense is meant as an introduction to this topic and should not in any way be construed as a replacement for personalized professional advice.
Please consult your own tax and financial advisors for specific advice on your individual situation.
David Christianson, BA, CFP, R.F.P., TEP, is a financial planner.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 7, 2012 B11
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- He's been taking funny seriously for 60 years
- Tell husband you're not talking to her... maybe tell him why
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Feds trim the beef from research
- Katz bogeys again
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Ex-Jets MacLean, Carlyle on Sochi coaching list
- Mount Carmel Clinic: An oasis of acceptance in a judgmental world
- To script or not to script...
- Katz bogeys again
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Tell husband you're not talking to her... maybe tell him why
- Burke will be back; he's just that good
- When money talks, it says, 'End fighting in the NHL'
- Mount Carmel Clinic: An oasis of acceptance in a judgmental world
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Cancer doesn't care who it may kill
- Jolie's mastectomy choice a game-changer
- Age is just a number, so don't count love out
- Goodbye, Susan; a privilege to know you
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Beloved piece of Winnipeg's music history deserves better
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- Katz bogeys again
- Dugouts could change the game
- Winter is coming
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Late deal in workplace sex-harassment case
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- Explore Desire seminars to 'push the boundaries'
- Going gluten-free doesn't mean giving up foods you love
- Cancer doesn't care who it may kill
- Mount Carmel Clinic: An oasis of acceptance in a judgmental world
- Katz bogeys again
- No better place to be than Fort McMurray
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Dugouts could change the game
- Happily selling shoes at age 89
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Selinger's ability to sell case weak link in tax-hike plan
- Emotional roller-coaster
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.