Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Sovereignty: the bogeyman in the closet

  • Print

Quebec elections have nothing to do with sovereignty. Or, they have everything to do with sovereignty.

This has been the dynamic tension in Quebec politics for generations, and it's playing out again as Quebecers prepare to vote in early April to choose a new government.

What our leaders think

The Free Press asked the leaders of each of Manitoba's three main political parties for their thoughts on the prospect of another Quebec referendum and what role Manitoba should play in the event of one. Here is an edited version of their comments.

 

Greg Selinger, Premier

"I believe that Quebecers, in the majority, want to remain a part of Canada. I think we all realize that we're stronger if we keep the country together. (In the event of a referendum) I think we just have to continue to find ways to make the country work for everybody. The No. 1 priority for Canadians, and that includes Quebecers, is to have a growing economy and good jobs for people and to make sure that we continue to have a universal health-care system. I think if we focus on the basics of a stronger economy with good employment opportunities so that we can generate the resources we need to look after people... we can make the case for why the country is one of the best places to live in the world."

Brian Pallister, PC leader

"I understand, by recent polls, that a significant majority of Quebecers don't want a separation referendum right now. That could change. But it is a cause for concern always... I think people see it as divisive by its nature. These debates are important ones, however, and the failure to engage plays to the advantage of those who do. We need to exert whatever authority we can, and as a bilingual province we're in a position to demonstrate how mutual respect works better than most... (In the event of a referendum) I do think we need to make the case (for Canada) more than just on an economic level. It can be made on an economic level, but I think we need to make it also on a cultural and a national level in terms of our influence, our collective benefits."

Rana Bokhari, Liberal leader

"I don't think (a referendum) is what Quebecers want. I know that's not what (other) Canadians want. I think we need to respect Quebec's democratic process and see what happens first (whether the sovereigntists win the provincial election). Canada is much more of a force to be reckoned with when we're united. And I hope that we stay together... In the case that there is a referendum, I think that supporting those (Quebecers) who want to continue to be a part of Canada would be a very important thing for us to do as a province. (But) it's all speculation right now. I want to see what happens in the provincial election first."

Related Items

Like so many who have gone before her, Quebec Premier Pauline Marois is trying to lead a party committed to sovereignty through an election in which she says sovereignty is not an issue. And like those predecessors, she is having trouble navigating the campaign while carrying this traditional Québécois dichotomy.

Is Quebec sovereignty an issue or not? Marois says it is not, and her campaign platform has only a vague pledge to hold a referendum at "the time the government deemed to be appropriate." She has yet to explain what that means and how a government she leads would determine the right time.

However, despite frequent assurances sovereignty is not an issue, Marois has continued to muse about the possible terms of independence.

Marois noted a variety of studies published during the last quarter century have outlined ways Quebec could be "independent" and still exist in partnership with Canada. For example, Marois said Quebec could continue to use the Canadian dollar, allow Quebecers to carry Canadian passports and enjoy free trade in people, goods and services with other provinces.

But remember, sovereignty is not an election issue.

Are voters in Quebec buying any of Marois' patter? To some extent, the answer is yes.

This is essentially the patter Quebec voters are used to getting from their sovereigntist politicians. Don't sweat the big stuff, and have faith the rest of the country, even after being rebuffed in a referendum, will not want a complete divorce. That there is enough affinity to ensure a close association with the rest of Canada.

Of course, there is plenty of evidence the whole idea of a mutually agreed upon separation with no lingering hostilities is really just the bait on a trap. That once support for sovereignty has been won in a referendum, a sovereigntist government could seek a more definite, formal separation from Canada. This is a strategy that has been debated for at least the last 20 years in Quebec.

It started in 1994, when Parti Québécois leader Jacques Parizeau became premier with a majority mandate after promising to hold a referendum. Parizeau was true to his word, scheduling a referendum for October 1995.

That summer, a few months before the referendum, then La Presse bureau chief Chantal Hebert (now with the Toronto Star) wrote a story about a meeting between Parizeau and European diplomats in which he said if he could get Quebecers to vote yes on any kind of sovereignty question, he would have them trapped "like lobsters in a pot of boiling water."

Over the years, the story has been retold using the term "lobster trap," which also captures Parizeau's strategy, even if it is not entirely accurate.

Although she is unlikely to utter an equally indiscreet admission, it is fairly well accepted Marois is playing the same game as her predecessor.

One of the most important footnotes to the lobster-pot tale is that, despite being published just a few months before the referendum took place, it did not dampen enthusiasm among the electorate for some form of sovereignty.

As history clearly shows, the 1995 referendum was a neck-and-neck race down to the wire. On referendum night, the fate of the federation was measured in tenths of a percentage point, with the No campaign ultimately coming out on top by just one point.

Where does this leave Marois? When she dropped the writ for this election, the PQ held a slight lead over her opposition, principally the Liberals. In the first 10 days of campaigning, the PQ is now running second to a Liberal party that is showing some momentum.

However, Marois still has a few cards up her sleeve. Last week, she announced media magnate Pierre Péladeau was now a PQ candidate. The effect of Péladeau's candidacy is still being gauged. One theory has it that this amplifies the sovereigntist strategy in Marois' campaign, and further alienates a majority of Quebecers who do not wish to do the Parizeau lobster-pot tango.

A competing theory is that Péladeau, one of the most powerful men in Quebec, will lend legitimacy and even sexiness to a relatively dormant political movement. Either way, this election will see Quebecers once again focusing intently on sovereignty, likely asking themselves before voting whether they can envision an existence beyond the current federation.

Even though it's not an election issue.

dan.lett@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition March 15, 2014 0

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Maurice Leggett on his three inceptions vs. Alouettes

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A squirrel enjoys the morning sunshine next to the duck pond in Assiniboine Park Wednesday– June 27, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • horse in sunset - marc gallant

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

What do you think of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s comment that Tina Fontaine’s slaying was a crime, and not part of a larger sociological problem?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google