Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 01/29/2014 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
Mr. Stephens was born in 1914, and while he had very little education, he had four lovely children. He worked as a millwright and was predeceased by his wife. At age 80, he fell under the sway of a man who he formerly worked with.
He was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, and later with Alzheimer's disease. His mental capacity was slipping when the former co-worker pounced. The co-worker offered to help Mr. Stephens, and the two moved in together.
The co-worker gradually isolated Mr. Stephens from his children. He helped with all of the banking. He took care of Mr. Stephens' physical needs and drove him to appointments after he lost his licence. He began to take advantage of Mr. Stephens. He was given a bank card and started to draw money out of Mr. Stephens' account. An agreement was signed to renovate the co-worker's house with Mr. Stephens' money. Large gifts were made.
At the end of the day, when Mr. Stephens passed away, his co-worker had taken more than $400,000. The children, as beneficiaries of the estate, were furious. They sued.
The judge who heard the case described the co-worker's conduct as "shameless." The deceased Mr. Stephens had been vulnerable because of his medical conditions.
Because the co-worker offered to help and Mr. Stephens accepted the help, the judge said a special duty of fairness was placed on the co-worker's shoulders. That duty made it impossible for the co-worker to accept gifts unless Mr. Stephens had independent legal advice. That advice was not received. Mr. Stephens also had to truly know what he was doing if any of the gifts were to stand. He did not.
The judge ordered the co-worker to repay all of the money to the estate. He also had to pay interest. Even more, he had to pay punitive damages of $25,000. Punitive damages are ordered when the court wants to send a message to the community and punish a person for antisocial behaviour.
The law the judge was able to apply is from England in the early 1800s. Judges held people to a certain moral standard in that era. If you step forward to help someone, you are expected to act selflessly. The person receiving the help is entitled to relax and not worry about their wallet being stolen.
The facts in this story are true. They are taken from the published decision of the court that heard the case in 1998. The family name has been changed.
Modern courts are more than willing to apply the principle developed nearly two centuries ago. What was shameless then remains shameless now.
There is nothing wrong with being helpful. Merely driving your neighbour to the store or shovelling their walk does not trigger the special duty. There is a point, however, where you become so helpful that the special duties begin to apply.
John E. S. Poyser is a Winnipeg lawyer with Tradition Law LLP estates & trusts. Contact him at 204-947-6801 or email@example.com.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 29, 2014 B6
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Get lie off your chest to ease inner turmoil
Interpretation of law yields comic results
Interpretation of law yields comic results
Marine repair business that runs out of owner's cottage at odds with Manitoba Conservation
A local artist has been painting portraits of indigenous people who died tragically
The final countdown: Here's how the Jets' charge for a playoff spot shakes down
Doc tough to watch, but not to be missed
Banning antibiotics what consumers want
Here's your weekend weather in Winnipeg
Bombing Yemen likely to backfire
Transcona-raised pro wrestler Kenny Omega is literally big in Japan
Murder revelations in The Jinx leave us fascinated, queasy
The vacation bucket list
Trending that caught Doug's eye... Late night legends
Potential slave dodges awkward bedroom adventure
Free Press to roll out affordable, user-driven access to news
Jets still gaining altitude
A penchant to self-destruct in full view
Matter of (their) opinion
No one talks tough on sewage
Don't you all have an imaginary friend?
Tax change helps families with children under 18
Shortchanging special needs
Is our democracy on crutches?
Wife overreacting to tipping back brown cows
Police hide in cone of silence
City's rail lines the real problem
Verdict after Gladue's death sends painful message about whose lives are valued
Outside the gallery, artists need to watch where they're going
Andy Kindler: something old, something new...
This is crunch time
Price has it right
Winnipeg actor Darcy Fehr went back to university at 40 and finds himself onstage in classic play
How's my home, James? What the measurement means to flood-prone Winnipeg
Aboriginal activists working to rock the vote
Co-worker's body odour causing stinky situation
A few dishes stand out at downtown fixture, but many others fall far short of excellence
Tina Fontaine's aunt wants more answers from Winnipeg's police chief
Documentary seeks out Canadian connection to Vietnam War