Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Still jonesing for Jane
There's more to author's enduring appeal than meets the eye
Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice has just turned 200, and Janeites everywhere are celebrating, decorously. Over its two centuries, the story of spirited Elizabeth Bennet and difficult Mr. Darcy has grown from a literary classic into a pop culture phenomenon.
The novel's original title was First Impressions, which Austen felt could be misleading. And certainly, Austen's fame has brought with it certain misconceptions. In honour of P&P's anniversary, let's clear a few up.
MISCONCEPTION 1: JANE AUSTEN WRITES ROMANCES
Yes, in Pride and Prejudice the heroine gets her man and her wedding. But when a writer for the feminist blog Jezebel recently suggested that Austen was "kinda just highbrow Twilight," the Janeite backlash was immediate -- and withering.
Pride and Prejudice may share a basic plot template with happily-ever-after Harlequin romances and Hollywood rom-coms (meeting, misunderstanding, marriage), but the tone is way different. With Austen's crisp, unsentimental streak and ironic eye for human weakness, she's often more com than rom.
Austen could also be unflinching about the relationship between marriage and money. Her ideal marriage is based on mutual respect and affection, but it's underpinned by some bracing pragmatism. W.H. Auden penned a poem in which he professed to be shocked by the way she revealed "so frankly and with such sobriety/ The economic basis of society."
MISCONCEPTION 2: JANE IS OLD-FASHIONED
Sure, Ms. Austen's characters are often driving curricles and wearing pelisses and playing piquet. (Whatever that is.) But they're also struggling with recognizable problems, which is why Austen's novels have held up to so many interpretations and updates.
In movies and books, Pride and Prejudice has survived zany supernatural mashups (Pride and Prejudice and Zombies; Mr. Darcy, Vampyre), Bollywood musical treatment (Bride and Prejudice), an amateur-sleuthing subplot (Death Comes to Pemberley) and relocations to a Mormon university in Utah (Pride and Prejudice: A Latter-Day Comedy), the American South (Pride, Prejudice, and Cheese Grits) and the Olympic curling trials (Pride, Prejudice, and Curling Rocks). There's also a 2012 comic novel called Pride and Platypus: Mr. Darcy's Dreadful Secret, and we can't begin to imagine what that's about.
Austen even does well on the Interweb. Take the latest pop culture take on P&P, The Lizzie Bennet Diaries. In this series of YouTube video blogs -- supported by social media spinoffs on Facebook, Tumblr and Twitter -- Lizzie is a grad student, living at home and snowed under by college debt, and Mr. Darcy is the killingly cool CEO of Pemberley Digital. (Lizzie refers to him as "snobby Mr. Douchey.") Lydia, Elizabeth's tearaway sister, is a tragic little party girl ("Heeelllooo INTERNET! -- Whaaaat! Twitter bitches!").
Clearly, these Millennial-style Bennet girls have a different sense of decorum from their 19th-century models. But their worries are the same -- men, money and mothers, with a little moral development slipped in -- and the kids seem to be responding.
MISCONCEPTION 3: JANE IS A PRUDE
D.H. Lawrence thought Austen "an old maid," and a recent "Wild and Wanton" edition of Pride and Prejudice felt it necessary to augment the original novel with brand-new naughty bits conveniently highlighted in bold print. As the back cover elegantly summed it up: "Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy FINALLY DO IT!"
It's insulting to assume that Austen didn't know about sex: She was a spinster, not a ninny. There's loads of submerged sexual tension in Pride and Prejudice. It's just that the characters don't feel compelled to talk about it all the time. Which is unusual these days and, really, kind of hot.
MISCONCEPTION 4: JANE HAS ALWAYS BEEN FAMOUS
Maybe it has something to do with that iconic moment when Colin Firth emerged from the lake in a dripping-wet cambric shirt in the wildly popular 1995 BBC television adaptation, but modern audiences tend to take Jane Austen's fame for granted. After all, she seems to have the literary canon locked down, and she's all over pop culture. She's even got a line on merchandising, from Jane Austen cookbooks to Jane Austen bus tours to Jane Austen tote bags.
But Austen sold modestly during her lifetime, and her posthumous reputation fluctuated. The full-blooded Romantics thought her wan, while the multi-volume Victorians found her narrow. But the early 20th-century moderns liked her style. Meanwhile, a recent surge from Masterpiece Theatre, Hollywood and Keira Knightley (as perhaps the most extravagantly beautiful Elizabeth Bennet ever) seems to have enshrined her enduring stories.
So happy birthday, P&P. We plan on holding a ball in your honour.
alison.gillmor @freepress.mb.ca
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 2, 2013 E1
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 7 articles for today)
At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
1:00 AM 0I turn 55 this week.
I'd never considered the possibility of the palindrome or, if I had, I attached the word ...
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Blue offence must make teams pay for blitzing Buck
- Mack, Burke give each other room to do their jobs
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Boyfriend's right; you should wait
- Bark in the park more than a lark
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Fiasco fixers
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- What a knockout!
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Your new 'friends' have unlocked a mystery
- Discovering your wife's kinky behaviour isn't an invitation to join the party
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Ground control to Major Chris
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Fiasco fixers
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Katz bogeys again
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Take a walk in the park to fight prostate cancer
- Psychics pull off a little magic
- Fiasco fixers
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- Helping others despite the cost
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- When the Ford jokes stop
- St. Norbert sees condo boom
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Lessons learned in 4-H last a lifetime
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Ground control to Major Chris
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.