Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

The LIBOR fix needs to be fixed

Regulation changes just one piece of the puzzle

  • Print

Given the importance in money markets of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), responsibilities for oversight are remarkably unclear.

The British Bankers Association (BBA) insists its process is transparent and unambiguous. As all contributing banks are regulated, the BBA argues regulators are responsible for individual banks' behaviour. The BBA knows each person responsible for submitting information and can demand to see the actual trades on which these figures are based. No evidence this was done has been disclosed.

The U.K. Financial Services Authority (FSA) does not have a specific regime governing LIBOR submissions, relying on broad rules governing identification and prevention of conflicts of interest.

Increased oversight and regulation of the rate setting mechanism is now proposed.

Proponents of "narrow" banking argue the separation of commercial and investment banking would solve the problem. But interest rate benchmarks affect normal lending and deposit-taking activity as well as trading. Proponents of the Volcker Rule argue preventing proprietary trading by banks would minimize the problem. In reality, manipulation was not only related to trading positions, but general banking activity.

Resistant to more stringent regulations, U.K. authorities nostalgically hanker for an anachronistic time when most bankers in London were located in the Square Mile of the City and relied on mutual trust. According to folklore, nothing more than a central-bank governor's raised eyebrows was necessary to prevent unsatisfactory conduct. The good old days were not what they seemed. In the 1980s, the head of a U.K. merchant bank told new employees he didn't know how they would get rich, given that insider trading was being banned.

A battle between major financial centres underlies the regulatory debate. In the 2000s, London became the world's dominant finance hub. Non-intrusive, market responsive "light touch" regulation was a factor in its success. Damage to London's reputation and stricter regulation would allow New York and European centres to regain competitive ground. U.S. authorities hinted they forced reluctant U.K. regulators to act and are at the forefront of driving reform. European Union banking and antitrust regulators have launched major investigations that may affect London's competitive advantage.

Amusingly, a recent BBA review proposed no changes to the rate-setting methodology, merely proposing a code of conduct and greater scrutiny of LIBOR's correlation with other financial data over time. A "shocked" BBA is now reviewing the process.

Given the large volume of transactions linked to the benchmark, it is essential that changes do not disrupt the operation of the market. Changes that affect legacy contracts may create significant legal problems.

There is agreement the rates should be based on actual transactions rather than theoretical estimates. There should be independent oversight of the process. Banks should be required to segregate the function for fixing rates from other activity to prevent conflicts of interest. Rate submissions should be documented to provide transparency and an adequate audit trail.

The approach specified by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission in its enforcement order imposed on Barclays embraces most of these principles.

But the changes pose different problems.

While basing LIBOR on actual transactions is desirable, the theoretical benefits may be difficult to achieve in practice due to the shrinking size of the market and reduced activity levels. As Sean Keane, a former head of money market trading at Credit Suisse, wryly observed: "...over the last four years there have been fewer actual transactions in the unsecured cash market than there have been discussions about how to reform LIBOR." Where trading is disrupted, as in 2007-08, it is unclear how an accurate submission can be determined.

As differences in bank credit ratings and quality increases result in greater variations in borrowing costs, LIBOR rates will become variable and less meaningful. Membership in a LIBOR fixing panel, once considered prestigious, may no longer be attractive. For loans and deposits, banks may move to internal rates, which reflect their cost of borrowing. The biggest effect will be on derivatives transactions.

Created in simpler times, LIBOR was designed for pricing loans and deposits. Over time, derivatives based on LIBOR have become dominant. Perversely, the cash market on which LIBOR is based now supports a vastly larger derivatives market. Curiously, generations of quantitative experts have built elegant models based on advanced mathematical techniques to price complex derivative instruments on a deeply flawed and easily manipulated base.

Christoph Rieger, head of fixed income strategy at Germany's Commerzbank, told a reporter: "LIBOR is not a market interest rate. The spot fixings are at best bank guesses of a hypothetical interbank borrowing rate. For that reason, this will always be subject to controversy." Given this fact, a U.K. member of Parliament, Steve Baker, asked the obvious question: "Members are increasingly wondering how such a large industry has been allowed to grow up on such a finger-in-the-wind number."

 

Satyajit Das is author of Extreme Money and Traders Guns & Money and a consultant to Jory Capital.

 

The LIBOR Fix

 

AUG. 4: From Too Big to Fail to Too Big to Jail?

TODAY: Fixing the LIBOR fix

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 11, 2012 A1

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Family of Matias De Antonio speaks outside Law Courts

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A Canada Goose cools off in a water pond Monday afternoon at Brookside Cemetary- See Bryksa’s Goose a day Challenge– Day 27-June 25, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • A Yellow-bellied Sapsucker hangs out on a birch tree in St. Vital. The Yellow-bellied Sapsucker is considered a keystone species. Other species take advantage of the holes that the birds make in trees. A group of sapsuckers are collectively known as a

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Now that the snow is mostly gone, what are your plans?

View Results

Ads by Google