Winnipeg Free Press > Opinion > Columnists > Web silliness a symptom of missing civility in politics

Columnists

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Web silliness a symptom of missing civility in politics

By: Dan Lett

18/12/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 9

It's hard to know which is worse.The Liberals for posting a doctored photo of Lee Harvey Oswald assassinating Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Or the crocodile tears gushing from Tory MPs and spin doctors.

The most recent incident of online political suicide confirms two important facts. First, that almost no one in federal politics has learned to harness the incendiary power of the Internet. And second, that Canada's federal political parties are losing touch with what it means to fight a fair fight.

The Liberal photo contest was supposed to be a humorous affair. The public was invited to post doctored photographs that showed all the places in the world Harper would rather visit than the climate change summit in Copenhagen, where he only reluctantly agreed to attend at the last minute.

I will admit to chuckling a bit when I saw the website two weeks ago. But I imagined Harper's head on the body of a pear-shaped snowbird walking on a sandy beach in black socks and sandals. Posting a photo of the head of state being assassinated is stupid, but then again, that is the only qualification needed to litter the Internet with hateful comments and images.

Political operatives should know better than anyone that online forums and contests are depositories for raw effluent that flows from angry, maladjusted axe grinders who lurk in the dark recesses of Internet. Open up a contest for anonymous visitors to submit doctored photographs of the prime minister, and what did you think would happen?

What is beyond brainless is the Liberals actually posted the submission. By now, most capable political operatives know that you don't make your enemy look like Adolph Hitler and you don't portray him or her as a victim of politically motivated violence.

Negative advertising, as a rule, is pretty effective but most strategists believe there are lines you must not cross when assailing the enemy. Although there will always be a core constituency that celebrates down and dirty efforts like this, more often than not they force leaders into the uncomfortable position of having to apologize for the indiscretions of underlings they have probably never met. And that doesn't make anyone look prime ministerial.

(Ironically, this is exactly the kind of boorish tactic that is vogue south of the border. Doctored images of President Barack Obama as a spear-bearing Aborigine and Hitler, or his wife Michelle as an ape, have become standard fare at anti-Democrat, anti-health care reform, anti-Obama rallies and websites. No one said electing the first African-American president would be easy, but this kind of stuff is hitting new lows.)

Back in Canada, disgust over the Harper image was mitigated somewhat by the mock outrage expressed by the Tories. The party that brought us pooping puffins and pamphlets accusing Grits of promoting pedophilia and anti-Semitism was apparently left speechless by the doctored photograph.

A spokesman for the prime minister said nobody from the government benches would comment on the photo flap. You can probably figure out what happened next. He made a comment.

Dimtri Soudas told Ottawa reporters the government wouldn't "dignify this with a response." To underline his claim that no one would comment, Soudas continued to add to his no comment. "Mr. Ignatieff should comment, not us, as this incident reflects on Mr. Ignatieff's judgment."

The Liberals apologized, but they did not do it gracefully. Shortly after posting an apology, a Liberal official told the Globe and Mail that Tories complaining about this kind of tactic was like "Attila the Hun complaining about the Romans' table manners."

The defence of the indefensible continued when Liberal strategist Warren Kinsella dug out a campaign ad from 2008 that showed a hapless Stéphane Dion surrounded by what looked like bullet holes. Unrepentant Tories claimed the holes were not bullet holes, but metaphorical holes in his election campaign. Uh-huh.

It is widely known that there is little civility left in federal politics. But the "you-call-that-vile-I'll-show-you-vile" contest now raging between the Tories and Liberals is reaching absurd proportions. What's next? A slap fight between Tory minister John Baird and Liberal critic Bob Rae on the floor of the House of Commons? (Baird outweighs his opponent, but Rae is sneaky fast. This one is too close to call.)

So as 2009 draws to a close, we are reminded that all is fair in love, war and political gamesmanship. When nothing is sacred in politics, the only thing we can hope is that sometime soon, politicians re-discover their collective sense of self-control and fair play.

Even as I wrote that I had to laugh.

dan.lett@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 18, 2009 A9

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 5 out of 5 (1 votes).

    • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

9 Commentscomment icon

"It's hard to know which is worse.The Liberals for posting a doctored photo of Lee Harvey Oswald assassinating Prime Minister Stephen Harper." How about writing a story about a picture you didn't even look at? The doctored picture was Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey Oswald, with Harper replacing Oswald.

Mr. Harper is not our head of state.

So Dan. I read your article about the Tory MPs crying croc tears and I don't see one MPs name. And which one of the "spin doctor(s)" other than Harper's press secretary said anything about the Harper assassination picture? [edited]

The observation really says that as governments get more powerful and do more things with more money...worse and worse people will stoop to a lower and lower level that will appeal to the baser instincts of the voters.

F.A Hayek devoted a whole chapter of The Road to Serfdom to the observation: Why the worst get on top.

Boils down to very unscrupulous people are willing to go to those baser levels whereas reputable people will remove themselves from gutter politics.

If there was not that great big pile of money called the income tax to fight over, then politics would still be a gentleman's calling.

It's not clear to me how this contest was moderated. It is being said that the Liberals posted this photo, but more likely they just let contestants directly post submissions. If so, the Liberals' stupidity was to have an unmoderated situation; they clearly didn't approve the image and removed it immediately. But they apparently don't understand the medium -- either the people responsible are too old, or they're teenage boys to whom the photo would've been funny anyway. Lose, lose. Maybe the real problem is not lack of civility, but the fact that our politics is dangerously indistinguishable from our entertainment.

If you can't tell if a picture of the PM being assasinated or the reaction of not just Tories but all rational Canadians is worse, I feel for you [edited].

Bastard:
O inglorious league!
Shall we, upon the footing of our land,
Send fair-play orders and make compremise,
Insinuation, parley, and base truce
To arms invasive?
King John Act 5, scene 1, 65–69

Bastard:
According to the fair play of the world,
Let me have audience.
King John Act 5, scene 2, 118

"Fair play" is merely customary courtesy, a show of civility to those one detests to the point of bloodshed. What has become for us a mark of civility—playing by the rules of the game—is still for Faulconbridge an ambivalent quality, a not always necessary evil.

What were they expecting when they asked the internet to be funny? Can our politicians (all of them) be unvoted? We need a do over button.

Great piece Dan...and sadly too true.

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Our Communities

Poll

Are you affected by the Daylight Savings Time change?

View Results

View Related Story