May 30, 2015


A law too far

A PROPOSED law that would allow police to remove people from a licensed premise before they have committed a crime is easy to understand from a police point of view, but it strays beyond the limits of what can be justified in a democratic society.

Bill 43 is intended to target patrons who create a risk of violence, either because they are threatening, have a history of violence or are members of a gang.

First, it’s questionable if police have the resources to respond to every case of anticipated violence. More importantly, however, the police already respond to complaints from bar owners about pending or real violence, without the requirement of special legislation.

Troublemakers can be banned from premises, and police can remove anyone who is causing problems.

But a law allowing police to remove anyone who might be a threat gives too much power to the state to intervene in the lives of citizens. The law should regulate misconduct, not apprehended or anticipated misbehaviour.

It also opens the door to harassment of individuals who have done nothing wrong, but whom someone believes might be a problem. It may be intended for gang members, but the problem with general legislation is that it sweeps up everyone in its grasp.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 1, 2013 a14

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Scroll down to load more