Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
A way back to school
The people of Lake St. Martin First Nation have become refugees in their own country, but their leaders must share much of the blame for the appalling situation that has continued to strand some 700 people in Winnipeg hotels and rental accommodations.
The flood that forced them off their reserve on the east side of Lake Manitoba last year was not their fault, but the band's leadership has refused reasonable offers of accommodation by the provincial and federal governments, which could have reunited them as a community.
The real victims in this sorry mess, however, are neither government nor the band's executives, but the children who are pawns in a wider power struggle.
The band's young people missed some schooling last year when floodwaters swamped their reserve. The new school year had just begun in rented accommodations in Winnipeg when fire officials closed the building because it didn't meet the fire code.
The band should have ensured the former junior high school met the requirements for occupancy. The oversight means about 84 students may be distributed among public schools in Winnipeg, although the province has offered to create a school within a school to keep them together.
Chief Adrian Sinclair is blaming government, but the line of attack is wearing thin. The province and Ottawa were also attacked for dramatically cutting the per diem paid to evacuees. The band neglected to say that every family is still receiving full income assistance from Ottawa. Band members who worked for the First Nation are receiving salaries. Their rent is fully covered. The per diems were intended to temporarily cover incidental costs.
The province has converted a former military base near Gypsumville, near the band's reserve lands, into a temporary community. Some 60 new homes were moved there, with plans for more if the need arose, but only 13 are occupied.
The rest have followed their leaders' dictum to stay put while negotiations continue for a permanent settlement, and possibly a new reserve. The band fears if it moves to Gypsumville, talks will stall and they will be stuck in a place they claim they do not want.
This and other rationalizations for remaining in Winnipeg are red herrings, but they reflect the tradition of mistrust that often characterizes aboriginal relations with the federal government.
A just-completed engineering study is expected to reveal whether the existing reserve can be saved. If so, more time will be needed to consider the possibilities.
In the meantime, the band should do the right thing and reunite the community in temporary homes at Gypsumville, where nearby schools and services can help meet their needs.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 13, 2012 A6
More Editorials
- Back to Top
- Return to Editorials
More Editorials
(1 of 9 articles for this week)
The Quebec tribe
06/17/2013 1:00 AM 0Quebec has a long history of xenophobia, or fear of the outsider. First it was the English conquerors, then it ...
Poll
Most Popular Editorials
- Pre-charter law cannot be upheld
- The Quebec tribe
- Digital records dilemma
- Transit misses the bus
- Firebugs a real threat
- Prepare for next recession
- Betrayal worth fighting
- InAPPropriate
- NDP still dilly-dallies about lake
- Transit justice
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.