Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Digital privacy at risk

  • Print

Are you being watched? You bet you are.

Canadian government agencies ask telecommunications companies and Internet providers for private information about their customers about 1.2 million times every year. The information is coughed up most of the time without a warrant, according to a report by Canada's privacy commissioner.

Enlarge Image

(DALE CUMMINGS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS FILES)

The companies have refused to say how many times the information was disclosed with a warrant, but it appears the courts were rarely used. The Canada Border Services Agency, for example, obtained customer data from telecom companies 19,000 times in one year. It obtained a warrant in less than 200 of those cases.

It's also unknown why the information was sought or what percentage of the requests were connected to criminal investigations or issues of national security. Neither the telecoms nor the government are required to let people know their privacy was breached.

Telecommunication companies can demand a warrant, but they are not obliged to do so. The law also does not require the government to get a warrant for basic subscriber information, which allows police to link Internet activity to a customer's identity.

The Conservatives' Internet surveillance bill, which died a quick death under public pressure more than a year ago, actually would have increased transparency by requiring the government to report all disclosures, including those obtained without a warrant. It was an imperfect bill, but it had the virtue of starting a conversation about how to balance privacy with the need for new investigative powers in the digital age.

Two new bills have since come out of Ottawa that raise fresh concerns about the ability, not just of government, but also the private sector, to obtain without a warrant basic subscriber information.

Bill C-13, which deals with cyber-bullying, would grant full immunity from criminal liability to telecoms that voluntarily release information to investigators. It's a form of bullying itself, which will lead to even more warrantless searches.

Of greater concern, however, is Bill S4, the Digital Privacy Act, which would allow private organizations to acquire information from telecoms and Internet providers without a warrant. A copyright holder, for example, would find it easier to identify someone who is stealing privileged material online.

The legislation assumes there is a lower expectation of privacy when it comes to so-called basic subscriber information.

That's probably true, but it doesn't mean Canadians have absolutely no expectation of accountability and transparency.

Enlarge Image

(DALE CUMMINGS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS FILES)

Communication companies should be required to disclose to their customers a third party has obtained their information when it is handed out without a warrant. Warrants should be required if the information is sought during a criminal investigation, except in special circumstances. And data acquired with a warrant should also be disclosed after an appropriate period of time, depending on the circumstances.

The main objective of the Digital Privacy Act is necessary and long overdue. It would require organizations to disclose breaches of security that put Canadians at risk for identity theft or other criminal activity online. The legislation includes stiff penalties for companies that fail to comply.

Both bills, however, will require amendments to ensure Canadians are protected from fishing expeditions and overzealous investigators. The government can start by explaining why it seeks subscriber information about Canadians more than one million times a year.

Right now, it's not clear what's going on, and that's a problem.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board, comprising Catherine Mitchell, David O’Brien and Paul Samyn.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 1, 2014 A12

History

Updated on Thursday, May 1, 2014 at 8:22 AM CDT: Adds image

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Peguis Chief Hudson comments on toddler's death upgrade to homicide investigation

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • May 22, 2012 - 120522  - Westminster United Church photographed Tuesday May 22, 2012 .  John Woods / Winnipeg Free Press
  • Aerial view of Portage and Main, The Esplanade Riel, Provencher Bridge over the Red River, The Canadian Museum for Human Rights and The Forks near the Assiniboine River, October 21st, 2011. (TREVOR HAGAN/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) CMHR

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should Winnipeg control growth to deal with climate change?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google