7°c Clear
N/A°c Sunny
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Gold-plated MP pensions cut to silver
Members of Parliament deserve a reasonable pension for the risk they take in leaving the regular workforce for electoral politics, but the gold-plated retirement package they have enjoyed for decades was out of line with Canadian values and ordinary decency.
The Harper government has decided to tighten up pension plans for MPs and public servants, a move that became more paramount following the government's decision to raise the age of eligibility for the Old Age Supplement to 67 from 65. The government could not ask Canadians to take a hit, while allowing elected officials and public servants to conduct business as usual.
Under the new terms, MPs will pay 50 per cent of contributions to their pensions by 2017, or $39,000 a year compared to $11,000 now. They won't be able to collect a full pension until age 65, as opposed to 55 today.
After just six years of service, MPs are eligible to receive one of the richest pensions in the country, courtesy of taxpayers, who have been contributing $24 for every $1 an MP puts into the program, according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. Current MPs with six years' service will be able to collect an average pension of $54,693 a year, indexed for inflation. Cabinet ministers fare even better. Harper will be eligible to receive a pension of $223,500 a year by 2015, the federation says.
These benefits are unavailable to any other Canadian, except perhaps to the top executives of the country's biggest private-sector firms. Members of Parliament, moreover, are well-paid with a base salary of $157,000, so they can afford to boost their retirement savings if the government allowance is not adequate for their needs.
The Opposition has called the reforms a ploy to distract attention from the omnibus budget bill, a wide-ranging piece of legislation. The government has abused the omnibus process, which effectively prevents proper scrutiny by Parliament and watchdog groups, but most opposition MPs knew better than to attack the pension reform package itself.
The taxpayers federation says that under the new plan, MPs elected after 2017 will be eligible for a $101,000 pension after three-terms. He or she would have contributed nearly $589,000 towards that pension.
The federation says it means taxpayers will have contributed $1.62 for every $1 contributed by an MP, far less than one-for-one ratio it was seeking, but still fairer than the present system.
The pension plan is still rich by the standards of most Canadians, but the reforms have trimmed the sails of those politicians who may have come to believe politics is a career, rather than a public service.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 19, 2012 A12
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Editorials
- Back to Top
- Return to Editorials
More Editorials
(1 of 8 articles for this week)
Hard questions
1:00 AM 0Prime Minister Stephen Harper has stated publicly he believes the $90,000 payment his former chief of staff made to get ...
Poll
Most Popular Editorials
- Senate jigsaw puzzle
- A hemispheric view of pot law
- Mr. Katz strikes out again
- Rule by law the new norm
- Welcome to the 1900s, drinkers
- Mayor Selinger
- Resign, Mr. Duffy
- NDP needs its fix
- Transit justice
- Canada's core values are strong
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.