Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Harper's Mideast odyssey

  • Print

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's unwavering support for Israel over the years has been criticized by those who say Canada has abandoned its reputation as an honest broker in world affairs, weakening its ability to reconcile competing interests. In fact, he has not broken new ground or diverged from tradition. Mr. Harper's language may be more passionate than that of some of his predecessors, but the message is still fundamentally the same.

In his speech Monday to Israel's Knesset, or parliament, for example, the prime minister said defending Israel was "a moral imperative."

"Canada and Israel are the greatest of friends and the most natural of allies," he said. All true.

He also said, however, Canada supports a "just and secure future for the Palestinian people" within a sovereign state.

These are familiar themes in Canadian foreign policy that date back to the formation of the Jewish state in 1948.

Canada was one of just 33 countries that voted in favour of the 1947 UN partition resolution that aimed to create separate Jewish and Palestinian states. Several Arab states invaded Israel in response, leading to a series of wars that left Israel in control of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Canada formally recognized Israel in 1948 and granted full legal recognition when it was admitted to the UN a year later.

Since then, Canadians have always stood behind Israel, while urging both Jews and Palestinians to find a way to peace.

Some pundits have said Mr. Harper should have criticized Israel for expanding its settlements in the West Bank in violation of UN resolutions, but Canada has already expressed its opposition to the settlements, which are seen as a barrier to peace.

It's not known what Mr. Harper may have said in private with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but lecturing the Jewish state in public during a state visit would not have accomplished anything.

Foreign-policy critics say Canada has abandoned the country's traditional "honest broker" approach to world conflict in favour of "conviction politics" or "principled foreign policy," as the Conservatives describe it.

This semantic debate ignores the fact the world has changed considerably since 2001, the year Canada joined the war against terrorism. Very few people said Canada would lose its "honest-broker" reputation by invading Afghanistan. And although Canada didn't join the coalition of the willing in Iraq, it would be disingenuous to say Canadians were "honest brokers" in that conflict.

The country earned its fair-dealer reputation during the bygone era of peacekeeping, when the doctrine of mutually assured destruction kept everyone honest, but Ottawa has taken firm sides on numerous issues since then under both Liberal and Conservative governments.

Mr. Harper's position on Iran may arguably be too strong at the moment, but it hasn't hurt Canada's reputation.

The prime minister went to Israel to expand trade and build the bonds of friendship with an old ally. He also furthered the peace dialogue with Palestinian leaders and others in the region, warmly received wherever he went.

It was as Canadian as it gets.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board, comprising Catherine Mitchell, David O’Brien, Shannon Sampert, and Paul Samyn.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 21, 2014 A6

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Winnipeg Jets Bogosian-Little-Ladd

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Aerial view of Portage and Main, The Esplanade Riel, Provencher Bridge over the Red River, The Canadian Museum for Human Rights and The Forks near the Assiniboine River, October 21st, 2011. (TREVOR HAGAN/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) CMHR
  • A goose heads for shade in the sunshine Friday afternoon at Woodsworth Park in Winnipeg - Day 26– June 22, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should the Canadian Museum for Human Rights use the word 'genocide' in exhibits on Indian residential schools?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google