Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Just scrap the ten-percenters

IT is hard to square a political party's claim to be a good steward of taxpayers' money with the millions of public funds spent each year to irritate Canadians with tedious, partisan and sometimes inflammatory propaganda. The Harper Tories are guilty as charged, but they are not the only party to have laid claim to probity in government while abusing public funds under the guise of "communicating" with voters.

Last year, the Montreal newspaper Le Devoir found, the Conservative Party of Canada spent in excess of $6 million to send "ten-percenters," as the flyers and brochures are known, to politically strategic ridings. The NDP and the Liberals, combined, spent $4 million on flyers. The entitlement ostensibly is to help MPs communicate with Canadians outside their constituencies.

The rationale for an MP from Ontario speaking to voters in Manitoba has never been well defended, despite Democratic Reform Minister Steven Fletcher's best efforts. But the spending privilege has been manipulated to high art through a rule that permits a bunch of MPs to pool their spending, tied to a maximum equivalent of 10 per cent of households in their own ridings. This "grouping" ramps up the reach of the allowances.

The Tories' regular use of groupings has triggered the disingenuous howls of "no fair" from opposition benches as the provocative nature of the flyers has dragged the practice to new lows. The tactic is also of questionable value, with many Canadians deeply offended by material that questioned the patriotism of Liberal Leader Michael "just visiting" Ignatieff and that implied the Liberal party has undermined support for Israel.

In an embarrassing turn, Saskatoon MP Maurice Vellacott publicly apologized Monday for telling New Democrat Peter Stoffer's constituents their MP supported the long gun registry. He has been an unwavering opponent of the registry. Mr. Vellacott's disclosure that the material was the party's responsibility reveals that MPs names merely front party campaigns.

The Conservatives' deceptive material about the Liberal record on Israel was particularly disconcerting, a divisive ploy that targeted sensitivities in an ethnic community. It underscored the abuse of tax dollars for political interest. Mr. Ignatieff wants to tweak the rules, but there is no merit to this spending privilege. It should be scrapped, forcing parties to pay for the partisan games they play.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 25, 2009 A14

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010; View the changes. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Follow

  1. WFP Hockey

    Download our new hockey app for the iPhone for Winnipeg Jets updates

  2. Editor's Bulletin

    Sign up for daily bulletins from editor Margo Goodhand

  3. Winnipeg Jets

    All things NHL on our Jets landing page

  4. Twitter

    Follow our reporters and our news feeds on Twitter

  5. News Cafe

    Check out the menu, read our blog posts or get info on coming events

  6. Facebook Fanpage

    Follow our Facebook Fanpage for story links, contests and special events

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Poll

Should infants be allowed in the House of Commons?

View Results

View Related Story