Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Lament for a consulate
You know it's a slow political day in Ottawa when a minor announcement about Canada and Great Britain sharing some embassy and consular services brings out the phrase mongers and predictions of doom and perdition.
Opposition Leader Thomas Mulcair lamented the end of an independent Canadian foreign policy, while other critics said the service-sharing agreement would weaken the Canadian brand in the world and tie Canada to the coattails of a one-time colonial power that is allegedly still hated in some parts of the world.
It's poppycock, of course, but then Stephen Harper's Conservatives can share some of the blame for hyperbole by staging the announcement as a big event, then proclaiming it was, in fact, a small matter.
It remains unclear why British Foreign Secretary William Hague flew to Ottawa for the announcement -- probably because it was a convenient stopover on the way to the United Nations and there was nothing more important on the bilateral agenda -- when it really wasn't worthy of more than a minor news release informing Canadians the Brits and Canucks would share space in a limited number of overseas diplomatic posts.
For starters, it means the British will be offered a small office at the Canadian Embassy in Haiti, where Great Britain is currently not represented, while a few Canadians will join the British legation in Myanmar, where we have no diplomatic or consular services.
It will expand the reach of both countries, without requiring either nation to make a major investment in bricks and mortar. Service-sharing agreements of various types are not new. Canadians work out of Australia's embassy in Cambodia, while Canada provides services to Australians in several countries. Britain already works out of Canada's office in Mali, and Italy has been looking after Canada's interests in Iran after Ottawa closed its embassy earlier this month.
The idea that Canada's foreign policy will somehow be confused with Britain's -- or vice versa -- is ridiculous, but that was the bogeyman raised by Mr. Mulcair and others.
As the brief but sharp debate illustrates once again, it's becoming increasingly difficult to have an ordinary political discussion in this country. No wonder, then, Canadians seem increasingly restless with the cacophony from Ottawa.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 26, 2012 A10
More Editorials
- Back to Top
- Return to Editorials
Poll
Most Popular Editorials
- Sobey clan to alter city market
- The Quebec tribe
- Prepare for next recession
- Syria needs a push
- Digital records dilemma
- Transit misses the bus
- Pre-charter law cannot be upheld
- Firebugs a real threat
- A sinking feeling
- Betrayal worth fighting
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.