May 26, 2015


Editorials

No border tax

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is proposing a new crossing fee at land borders to help pay for the increased cost of policing them, but the idea of taxing Canadians to pay for American security is weak.

The Americans have been boosting security at the border since the events of 9/11, but the idea of a new tax would be counterproductive for many reasons. U.S. businesses that depend on tourists, for example, are opposed to the idea because of fears it would reduce traffic, which is currently worth about $21 billion a year in Canadian spending alone.

A fee for every car and every person on a tourist bus would also contribute to even longer delays at the border, which could have serious consequences for commercial carriers. It also is contrary to the spirit of free trade and to the idea of a "North American community," as the Canadian Chamber of Commerce put it.

Bridge tolls at key crossings are collected to pay for the infrastructure. Air travellers pay a small fee on their airline tickets to enter the U.S., but such fees have become customary and are not disruptive.

Security trumps all other concerns in the U.S., but it should not be allowed to weaken the special relationship that has allowed the two countries to co-operate in ways that are mutually beneficial.

The two sides are developing a common security approach to border protection designed to speed up the flow of goods and people, but a new fee would merely undermine that process and the ultimate goal of a continental security strategy.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 23, 2013 A8

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 26 11:14 pm

Brassard, Lundqvist lead Rangers past Lightning 7-3 wfp.to/ROU

Paul Samyn | @PaulSamyn

May 26 11:01 pm

Growing troubles for city trees on Wednesday's front page of @WinnipegNews pic.twitter.com/xw8mjGQWfX

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 26 10:24 pm

'We don't want to hold another vigil' wfp.to/ROq

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 26 9:36 pm

Tories nominate Janice Morley-Lecomte for Seine River wfp.to/ROr

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 26 9:28 pm

Will Boudreau finally get respect he deserves? wfp.to/ROw

Scroll down to load more

Top