Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

PM seeks harmony on Mali

  • Print

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has decided he wants a broad consensus in Parliament and across Canada before deciding whether to extend the deployment of a C-17 cargo plane in support of France's counter-insurgency in Mali.

He's been obliged by Opposition leader Tom Mulcair who has agreed, following consultation with the prime minister, to continue Canada's role in the Mali operation. In return, the prime minister has agreed to allow the foreign affairs committee of Parliament to monitor Canada's role in the conflict.

Mr. Harper was not required by law or tradition to seek a coalition, but the move is both smart and appropriate.

It's politically smart because it provides a wider front for moving forward and ensures the decision to help the French will not become a wedge issue. Afghanistan was frequently a divisive issue in Parliament and among the general population, which the prime minister clearly wants to avoid over Mali, even though Canada's role is miniscule.

It's appropriate because the government should keep other parties informed on foreign deployments and try to gain their acceptance.

Mr. Harper's sudden concern for a consensus, however, also raises questions that are rarely asked, namely: What is the correct political process for sending troops to war or peacekeeping and peace-making missions?

In Canada, the declaring of war or deployment of troops has been a somewhat vague affair. On Sept. 9, 1939, Parliament held a debate and voted to declare war on Germany, but it was not required and it had no legal force. The next day, then prime minister William Lyon Mackenzie King simply signed an order in council declaring war. Sept. 10 is marked as the day Canada declared war.

There was no parliamentary debate when Canada declared war on Japan in 1941 because the House wasn't sitting. Mr. King simply signed another order in council.

The right to declare war or send troops overseas is a cabinet prerogative in parliamentary tradition, but an amendment to the National Defence Act at the start of the Korean War in 1950 required that Parliament be recalled within 10 days following the deployment of troops for action.

The amendment, however, didn't change the cabinet prerogative; it merely ensured Parliament would have an opportunity to meet.

Such recalls, assuming Parliament wasn't already sitting, were eventually known as "take-note" debates, which were used numerous times since the Korean War, including several debates on the Afghan conflict.

As in the past, they were usually intended to inform Parliament of cabinet decisions or intentions, and not to seek permission.

Some critics find this process unacceptable, particularly when compared to the intricate system of checks and balances on war-making in the United States.

Parliament, however, is a different creature. A minority government would need to solicit the support of other parties or risk a vote of no-confidence, but a majority party has a mandate to rule.

Prime Minister Harper may not need Mr. Mulcair's support, but the country is better for it, particularly at a time when decisions about war and peace are far less clear than when the enemy was Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board, comprising Catherine Mitchell, David O’Brien, Shannon Sampert, and Paul Samyn.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 25, 2013 A12

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Feeling at home at Home Expressions

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A young goose   reaches for long strands of grass Friday night near McGillvary Blvd-See Bryksa 30 Day goose challenge- Day 19 - May 23, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • Goslings with some size head for cover Wednesday afternoon on Commerce Drive in Tuxedo Business Park - See Bryksa 30 Goose Challenge- Day 12- May 16, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos


Are you in favour of relocating Winnipeg's rail yards and lines?

View Results

Ads by Google