Editorials
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
RCMP red-faced
RCMP and their lawyers have said the email is incorrect and was based on flawed information, but their response merely compounds the problem because it demonstrates they don't understand their sin isn't the email, but the fact it was withheld from the inquiry. It is up to the inquiry judge to determine its importance and validity, not the RCMP and their lawyers.
Senior RCMP officers described the incident as a simple "oversight," but such a glib dismissal is unacceptable. The failure to tender insignificant evidence might be an oversight, but an email that reinforces the suspicion that the officers approached Mr. Dziekanski with the intent of using extreme force is not a minor matter.
Subsequent testimony may show that the email is irrelevant. Unfortunately, however, commissioner Thomas Braidwood felt compelled to put the inquiry on hold until the fall so the contents of the email can be investigated. Depending on the outcome of that investigation, it's possible that the officers involved may need to be re-examined, which could delay the whole affair until the new year.
The inquiry has not been kind to the image of the RCMP, which is unfortunate if it reinforces the cynical views about police that are becoming more common.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition June 24, 2009 A14
- Rate this
-
-
We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.
You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.
Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.
Post Your Comment
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
-
Flu Fight
News about the world's battle against the H1N1 flu pandemic
-
Winnipeg Blue Bomber Report
All of the latest on the Big Blue
-
Buy the Bowl
If dogs can paint, you can fight world hunger
-
Follow the Way!
Join United Way on its journey toward lasting change and better lives.
-
Winnipeg road closures
Check if your commute is affected
-
Editor's Bulletin
Sign up for daily bulletins
-
Blogs to Watch
We pick our favourite local blogs for you to follow
-
Breaking News Widget
Create and embed a Winnipeg Free Press breaking news widget on your site or blog
- Back to Top
- Return to Editorials
Advertisement
PREVIOUS
Most Popular
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- No more jail time for tot's death
- Tire problem factor in plane's belly landing
- Doer the diplomat
- Your weekend weather
- Tears and fears
- It all comes down to Bishop
- His turn to confront mortality
- New police station moves a step closer
- Preliminary autopsy shows North Dakota college students drowned
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- No more jail time for tot's death
- New police station moves a step closer
- Big prize or bust for Blue and Kelly
- Tories 'represent renewal' says McFadyen
- Martin sorry for Tory torch accusations
- Former Crocus directors to answer to allegations
- Police seek aid in locating missing teen
- Unnecessary visits discouraged
- Tears and fears
- $50-million lottery ticket bought in Manitoba
- Tears and fears
- His turn to confront mortality
- How I found my dad's grave: A SON'S STORY
- Tire problem factor in plane's belly landing
- Province, feds to improve Trans-Canada west of Winnipeg
- Whenever I hear women complaining about the rat race, I think about the career I didn't have
- US man accused of killing ex-son-in-law in New Jersey to tell jurors he was too fat to kill
- The killer never left
- Best. Video. Ever.
Ads by Google
2 Comments
Posted by: Jason Wayne
June 24, 2009 at 7:00 PM
If there was such a huge coverup, why was the email even brought forward? If it had been kept secret then it would be covered up.
Journalism at it's best.
It's amazing really, police get chastised for NOT having a plan to deal with people. Then someone says they "planned" to taser this immigrant. (Perhaps they were making sure they had a taser, which is a LESS THAN LETHAL weapon) But then they're scrutinized for planning to do something? How do they win?
I'd invite any member of the media to stand in front of me and I'll destroy some property then brandish a stapler. Then I'll attack you with it, I'd really be curious to see what they'd do. Cower in fear is the likely result. Well that and call the police!
Posted by: diver
June 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM
They didn't forget to give the information forward. It was given to the government lawyer. The lawyer made the mistake not the rcmp so maybe you should stop your venomous writing and read all of the facts. Also, if you read the email which i think you have failed to do before writing this piece you would realize that they in fact said if there was no co-operation they would maybe use the taser. What they decided is that someone who was throwing furniture and computer equipment around a secure area with witnesses and innocent bystanders would be dealt with force if necessary.
Make sure that you read all the facts and information available before condemning the rcmp for preparing.