Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Safe-flood standard is too low

  • Print

A sweeping examination of how Manitoba, its governments and citizens protect property against flooding has found current standards -- basically protection from a one-in-100-year flood -- to be inadequate. It is at once too risky and it is not practically enforced, two committees that studied the devastating 2011 flood at Lake Manitoba and beyond found. The better yardstick, the reviews conclude, would be to build to a one-in-200-year standard in flood-prone areas.

The current standard, imposed in the wake of the 1997 Flood of the Century on the Red River, no longer is adequate. Raising properties to elevations to fend against a one-in-100-year flood gives good protection in each single year (one per cent chance of flood recurrence), but after 50 years at the same location, the risk rises to 40 per cent. That's unacceptably high, the reviews said.

Further, the current rule has imposed irrational requirements on those rebuilding in the Lake Manitoba area. That's because the rule requires they rebuild to protect for a one-in-100-year flood event, or for the flood of record, whichever is higher. Lake Manitoba residents were forced, therefore, to rebuild to protect against a one-in-800 flood, or, in the case of Twin Beaches, a one-in-1000 flood. That's unfair, the committees conclude because the 2011 flood on Lake Manitoba was, practically speaking, a man-made flood. It is unlikely to recur naturally. Furthermore, the province has said it will build better defences on the Assiniboine and two permanent outlets for Lake Manitoba.

The flood-protection standard needs fixing. But no regulation is worth the trouble if it is not used or enforced. Only one Lake Manitoba municipality required developers to prove their projects conformed to the flood-level rule. Officials said it's tough to turn down development projects that expand their tax base.

For flood-protection rules to work, the province might have to play the heavy with municipalities and developers. The focus, however, should be to arm property buyers or owners with good, useable information to protect themselves. Map flood prone areas and make Manitobans aware, with site-specific information, what elevations are required to protect property from damage, the committees advised.

Developers should be compelled to get certification their project meets the flood-level rule.

These can be practical tools to aid Manitobans, who know they live on an ancient flood plain, but have little good information on how that can affect them, personally. The data and mapping must be nimble to reflect changing risk that reflects an evolving climate and landscape.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board, comprising Catherine Mitchell, David O’Brien, Shannon Sampert, and Paul Samyn.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 12, 2013 A12

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Jets This Week: Predicting the line-ups

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • KEN GIGLIOTTI  WINNIPEG FREE PRESS / July 23 2009 - 090723 - Bart Kives story - Harry Lazarenko Annual River Bank Tour - receding water from summer rains and erosion  damage by flood  and ice  during spring flooding -  Red River , Lyndale Dr. damage to tree roots , river bank damage  , high water marks after 2009 Flood - POY
  • PHIL.HOSSACK@FREEPRESS.MB.CA 090728 / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS White Pelicans belly up to the sushi bar Tuesday afternoon at Lockport. One of North America's largest birds is a common sight along the Red RIver and on Lake Winnipeg. Here the fight each other for fish near the base of Red RIver's control structure, giving human fisher's downstream a run for their money.

View More Gallery Photos


Do you think the Jets' three pre-season losses in a row are a sign of things to come?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google