FYI

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

A history of violence

  • Print

It's surprising to learn that an Olympic athlete stands accused of murder, but there's nothing new about gun violence in South Africa. While the country's gun-related violent crime rate has dropped in the wake of 2000's Firearms Control Act, The Guardian reports that "many people say they live in fear of crime in South Africa, with Johannesburg still listed as one of the five most dangerous cities in the world, along with Mogadishu and New Orleans." In a Globe and Mail article this week, Geoffrey York reported:

Related Items

"South African airports and casinos have prominent signs directing people to storage rooms to deposit their weapons. Criminals assume that their victims have guns. When they break into a house, their first step is to search for the owner's gun.

"Guns are widely used in the most common crimes here: they are used in 77 per cent of house robberies and 87 per cent of business robberies, and they are the cause of death in more than half of all murders, reports say. Fear of guns is why South Africa's middle classes are hidden behind three-metre-high electrified fences and walls, in compounds with motion detectors and metal-barred doors. They hire security companies with gun-toting guards, who promise "immediate armed response" to every activated alarm."

As that last paragraph suggests, many South Africans don't trust the police to protect them. GlobalPost has noted "growing frustration over this country's corrupt and incompetent police at seemingly every level of the system, from traffic cops soliciting a bribe for a "cold drink" to the controversial appointments of some of the country's highest-ranking police officials." In 2012, The Economist reported that:

"Last year 5,869 formal complaints were laid against the police, mainly for assault and attempted murder. Police statistics concede that 566 people, including innocent bystanders, were shot dead or otherwise killed by the police in 2009-10; another 294 died in their custody."

On Thursday, South African police appointed a new chief investigator in the Oscar Pistorius case, replacing a detective after revelations the officer was charged with seven counts of attempted murder.

Police corruption and venality breed lawlessness, and it also prompts citizens to start taking protection into their own hands. The Guardian reported that "six out of 10 South Africans feared burglary more than any other crime," and that many people relied on private security services to pick up the police department's slack.

Pistorius's apartment complex seems to have been a veritable fortress; The New York Times reported that the buildings were "protected by high walls and razor wire."

Some early reports indicated that Pistorius may have accidentally mistaken his girlfriend for an intruder. (The police have dismissed this theory.) The facts of this particular case are still in dispute, but a defence of mistakenly firing at a perceived intruder is more plausible in corrupt, gun-infested South Africa than it might be elsewhere.

"And that is a particularly South African mistake, that we are so paranoid you are ready to fire off bullets when you don't know is coming," an acquaintance of Pistorius's told the Times this week. "We are such a messed up country in some ways, and every now and then it comes to the surface with events that bring it into such stark relief."

-- Slate

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 23, 2013 J3

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.