Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Churches get creative with their names
KEN GIGLIOTTI / FREE PRESS ARCHIVES Enlarge Image
Winnipeg has a few unique church names, such as Springs on Lagimodiere Blvd.
There was a time, not so long ago, when it was easy to name a church. All a congregation needed to do was follow a few simple guidelines.
Churches could be named chronologically: First Baptist, Second Church of Christ, Scientist or Third Presbyterian.
Comfortable with being called Mormons
SOMETIMES it doesn't matter what you call your church -- others will choose your name for you.
That's what the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints discovered. For almost 15 years the church tried to get non-members to stop using the word "Mormon" to describe the group. This year, they gave up.
For a long time, church members didn't mind being called Mormons, even if though it was coined by critics as a derisive nickname in the 19th century. But when the church was accused of not being Christian in the mid-1990s, church officials began to encourage members, and the media, to always use the longer and more official name.
Despite their best efforts, the change didn't take. Why? Blame the Internet; it's just much easier to type "Mormon" into a search engine.
According to the church, about 33 million people used the words "Mormon," "Mormons" or "Mormonism" to search for information about the church last year. Only a few searched for the church by its official -- and much longer -- name.
"It's simply a reality that people think of Mormons, they don't think of Latter Day Saints," noted Michael Otterson, managing director of public affairs for the church. "Mormon is here to stay."
Church officials still urge journalists to use the church's full name instead of the "Mormon Church." But they also say it's acceptable to refer to members as Mormons.
Allan Robison, president of the Winnipeg Stake, or conference, agrees with the church's new position. "The public has used it for so many years -- it's not going to go away," he says. "We're comfortable being called Mormons."
-- John Longhurst
Churches could take their cue from geography, naming themselves after a street, neighbourhood, nearby park or part of town.
For some denominations, like Anglicans, Lutherans and Catholics, saints were a great source of names (St. John, St. Peter, St. Matthews, etc.). So were biblical figures like the Holy Family, Mary or the Holy Ghost, as were biblical concepts like Epiphany, Faith, Grace, Abundant Life, Immaculate Conception or Miracle, to name a few.
If a church served a specific racial or cultural group, the naming process was really easy: Chinese Alliance, Filipino Evangelical, Korean United Church, Spanish Church of God Pentecost.
Those days seem long gone and far away, at least in the evangelical world.
Blogger Dennis Baker took a look around the U.S. and came across the following names for churches: Resonate, Revolution, Radiance, Mosaic, Encompass, Soma, Journey, Mars Hill, Solomon's Porch, Celebration, Legacy, Encounter, The Well, Carpenter's, Flipside, Substance, The Orchard, The Pursuit, Liquid, The Table and dozens more -- a total of 130 decidedly untraditional church names in all.
Unique church names are not only found in the U.S.; Winnipeg has a few, such as Soul Sanctuary, Oasis, Springs, The Bridge, Solidrock, Church of the Rock, Faithworks 4 U, The Meeting Place and The Den.
What's driving the changes? The same thing that's driving name changes in the business world: the need to stand out in an increasingly noisy and cluttered marketplace. In this case, it's the marketplace of theological ideas; people want a name that sticks out -- one that arouses curiosity and sticks in the mind of those who might be seeking a new church.
People also want names that stand out on the Internet. There are a lot of First Baptists out there, but how many churches do you think are named Liquid? (It's in New Jersey, in case you're interested.)
But how to come up with a new name? One way is to ask the congregation what they like. Or you could do what Matt Sweetman, a church planter in Chicago, did. When it was time to find a name for his new church, he came up with a list of names and then did a survey in the community.
In selecting potential names, his first criteria was that it had to be simple: "One or two words with the word 'church' after it," he wrote on his blog. "People need to know we are a church, so having 'church' (in the name) is important to me."
He also wanted it to be attractive for people who didn't go to church, but not one that alienated Christians. It had to be "something non-traditional, because we are targeting a younger urban crowd, yet something not too wacky that would turn away Christians who are looking for a church," he said.
The four names that rose to the top for consideration were: Message Church, Crimson Church, Destination Church and Celebration Church. Church members then went out and asked people: "Purely based on the name, which church would you be most likely to visit if a friend invited you or if you saw an advertisement?"
The winner? Destination Church -- that was the name most appealing to churchgoers and non-churchgoers alike.
In addition to being original, he wrote, "it has great theological meaning. Our destination is Jesus. Everything ultimately finds meaning in him. It speaks of purpose, clarity and goals. Most Christians thought it sounded strong and had lots of marketing potential. Non-Christians shocked us with their opinion of this name. Ninety per cent of them really liked it. They understood it. It made sense to them and they thought it sounded pretty cool, actually."
Destination might be a cool name, but the coolest ever might be the St. James-Bond United Church in Toronto. The church, which closed in 2006, got its unique name when St. James Presbyterian and Bond Street Congregational merged in 1928.
My own personal favourite is the Strict and Particular Baptist Church in London, England; nobody who joined it couldn't say they weren't warned.
So, what's in a name? From my brief survey, it should be memorable, reflect congregational character and beliefs and arouse curiosity. That, plus be easy to find on the Internet.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 1, 2010 H13
More FYI
- Back to Top
- Return to FYI
Most Popular FYI
- Safety -- and a new start
- Big culture ON THE PRAIRIE
- Warm-up for the Jewish Olympics
- Higher education: Funding puts reserve school on par with public system
- Our City Our World / Jewish Community
- Risky business
- Prescription for disaster
- Where are the children buried?
- A big heart, a troubled mind: Rick Rypien
- Connecting to her ancestors
- Higher education: Funding puts reserve school on par with public system
- CBC's Lang writes about innovation
- Dam deals
- Risky business
- It's been a Good Week for... It's been a Bad Week for.,,
- Safety -- and a new start
- Big culture ON THE PRAIRIE
- New biography celebrates first female ordained minister
- Prescription for disaster
- "Overheard
- Higher education: Funding puts reserve school on par with public system
- Risky business
- Warm-up for the Jewish Olympics
- Our national shame
- Synagogue to honour longtime Torah reader
- Tibetans burning for freedom
- Safety -- and a new start
- Whiteshell's sacred stones
- The cost of calories: It's expensive to eat healthily
- Changer de cap
- Higher education: Funding puts reserve school on par with public system
- Prescription for disaster
- Risky business
- Journey of a lifetime
- Titanic -- The Manitoba connection
- War brides overcame harsh, unexpected conditions to build new life
- Rough road to redemption?
- Hindle tells Fish stories in self-help book
- Warm-up for the Jewish Olympics
- Manitobans wage war with Lyme disease, skeptical doctors
Ads by Google









You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010; View the changes. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.