FYI

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Dislike our decorum? Well, x-word you!

  • Print

FIDDLESTICKS!" fussed Manitoba NDP member of Parliament Pat Martin when the federal Conservative government led by (expletive deleted) Prime Minister Stephen Harper introduced closure on debate over the budget.

Actually, Martin did not say fiddlesticks. He said a word that is more commonly heard in his constituency than that antiquarianism and which is more familiar across the country as well, even if you will never read it in the hallowed pages of the family-friendly Winnipeg Free Press or almost any other newspaper in the country, or for that matter, on any TV or radio news show, where skirting around it is a little more problematic.

Imagine (these exercises in civil etiquette are not always easy) Peter Mansbridge on CBC's The National newscast solemnly intoning "Pat Martin, New Democratic MP for Winnipeg Centre, said today 'This is a expletive disgrace,' and then tweeted to a voter who disagreed with him 'Expletive you!' "

Broadcast media, of course, have their own way of getting around quoting common language: They, like the print media, sometimes get so bold as to say "Pat Martin used the f-word" or the s-word or the n-word or the c-word or the x-word (don't ask; I am not authorized to tell you what that one actually is.)

Most people wouldn't be surprised that Pat Martin might swear. Most people swear either routinely -- come by the Free Press newsroom sometime and eavesdrop till your ears turn blue and drop off -- or occasionally, under situations of great duress, such as when you hit your thumb with a hammer. Ouch! is a word only used in family-friendly circumstances.

There is a certain irony, however, in this situation. It is not just because of Martin's obvious comfort and familiarity with the basic obscenities of the English language. Rather it is because the New Democrat is an outspoken proponent of decorous behaviour in public discourse.

Perhaps he thinks that should only apply in the House of Commons during Question Period, although even there his language is often intemperate, even if it isn't obscene. But that's politics and we're used to that. And this is the free press or, more particularly the Free Press, where you will never actually read what Pat Martin actually said -- we blush easily. "Expletive you!" you say, thinking you have a right to know. "Fiddlesticks," say we.

 

...by Tom Oleson

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 19, 2011 j2

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.