Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
One to watch
Stage 2 of the Southwest
Rapid Transit Corridor
A recent survey by the Natural Resources Defense Council -- a Washington environmental-advocacy group that is pro-transit -- found Americans would love to have more public transit -- as long as they don't have to pay for it.
Support was highest in the Philadelphia suburbs, where more local spending on transit was favoured by a ratio of 82 per cent to 13 per cent.
So here's a shout out to you, City of Brotherly Love, from the city of Bargainly Love.
We, too, want more public transit without the inconvenience of having to shell out for it.
Take Stage 2 of the Southwest Rapid Transit Corridor. Even though the city is already arguing about routes, nobody has ponied up the cash to extend Winnipeg's rapid transit route to the University of Manitoba.
One theory about how it can be paid for is to use the taxes generated through development of housing and businesses along the route.
Well, the NRDC survey does that one better. Why not have the developers pay for the rapid-transit link up front? That's the option the Philadelphia survey respondents favoured. The developers could get their money back through tax breaks after the fact.
Would developers in Winnipeg be willing to take a risk for rapid transit? That's something to think about next time you are taking that long, slow bus ride down Pembina Highway.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 15, 2012 J2
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More FYI
- Back to Top
- Return to FYI
More FYI
(1 of 23 articles for this week)









You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.