FYI

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Premiers might ask a nurse about health reform

  • Print

Our health-care system is based on an on-demand model of physicians and hospitals providing acute and episodic care. While this system works well for the vast majority of citizens, it is a poor match for many of those with chronic diseases.

As a nurse and an academic, my particular interest is examining how health and social services can work together to improve people's lives -- and contain costs. In my view, problems arise when circumstances in the world change and conventional wisdom does not; the increasing prevalence of chronic illnesses among the Canadian population is a circumstance to which our health system has not yet adapted.

The truth is, a very few people use most of our expensive health-care resources.

As part of a series of reports that formed the findings of the Canadian Nurses Association National Expert Commission, myself and my colleagues highlight that the small proportion of the population who use a disproportionate amount of current health-care services are people with chronic illnesses, such as diabetes, heart disease, stroke, arthritis and asthma.

Within that group, however, we discovered it is the poor, and a subgroup with a co-existing mental health issue (anxiety, depression, substance abuse, personality disorder, schizophrenia, dementia) who are the most frequent health-care seekers.

For example, we learned in 2010, only one per cent of the Ontario population (about 130,000 people) used 49 per cent of hospital and home-care services. And only five per cent of the population (about 650,000 people) used 84 per cent of those services. These statistics are mirrored across the country.

In our study, we asked how well these individuals are served by their many visits to emergency wards, stays in hospital and visits to family and specialist doctors, and explored whether they could be better served by other, less costly, models of care.

In other words: How can we transform the way we deliver care?

We found proactive, targeted, nurse-led care that focuses on supporting patients to manage their own chronic illnesses and circumstances is a better model than "usual" on-demand hospital and physician-led care. Other quality evaluations have found nurse-led care is either more effective and equally or less costly than the current "usual care" or equally effective and less costly.

Such nurse-led models of care can save millions of health-care dollars a year by reducing hospital readmissions for those with chronic illness.

For example, a 10 per cent reduction in the $8 billion spent on acute care in Ontario for the one per cent of citizens who account for almost half of hospital and home care spending could result in a savings of $800 million a year -- money that could be used for managing chronic diseases in the community or at home.

Research has also shown a post-hospital discharge program for patients who have been hospitalized for congestive heart failure can cut hospital readmissions by more than 60 per cent. Similarly, a primary-care asthma-intervention program yielded 50 per cent fewer emergency visits.

Beyond the issue of cost-effectiveness, a nurse-led, proactive, comprehensive model of health and social care makes sense because nurses, more than any other health-care professional, have been trained to manage patient health, and include the social circumstances that determine health in general. They are also trained to identify specific situations that require more expert input from members of the care team.

For the past 50 years, we have had an insured on-demand physician-led model focused on episodic acute care. For people with multiple chronic conditions, it's time to test the value of a nurse-led model, with a physician as one member of a team. Every member of the team can then do what they do best, with nurses enlisting all the health and social services that can augment the determinants of a person's overall health.

Canada's provincial and territorial premiers will be meeting this month as the Council of the Federation and a report from the federation's health-care-innovation working group will be on the agenda.

We hope this different model of care, with nurses at the forefront, will be explored and endorsed for addressing the growing needs -- and costs -- of patients with multiple chronic illnesses.

 

Gina Browne is an expert adviser with EvidenceNetwork.ca and a professor with McMaster University's faculty of health sciences. She is co-author of a report, Better Care: An Analysis of Nursing and Healthcare System Outcomes, which is available on the website of the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 14, 2012 J11

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.