FYI

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

The aftertaste of revenge

They've killed Osama; is case closed?

  • Print

LOS ANGELES -- Do Americans feel better now that their forces have killed Osama bin Laden? The pictures and video of spontaneous celebrations across the nation, of baseball fans chanting "USA, USA" of bagpipes and fist pumps at ground zero: All declare the answer an unqualified yes.

But researchers who probe the vengeful mind suggest that for some, bin Laden's demise will reopen psychic wounds, lay bare persistent mental health problems and bring less satisfaction than is widely believed.

For all that some Americans may cheer, beneath the breast-beating and flag-waving, many of them are churning.

"There is a strong assumption that this event will be especially beneficial for the loved ones of people killed or hurt in the events of 9/11, and that they will experience 'closure,' " said Kevin Carlsmith, a professor of psychology at Colgate University, an expert in the psychology of retribution. "But there's really no evidence one way or the other to suggest this is the case -- at least, none that I've ever come across."

Evolution has deeply etched in our psyches the impulse to exact retribution against those who do us harm, researchers say: The person who transgresses basic rules of social conduct threatens the coherence and safety of our group, and our need to see the offender punished may have helped us to survive as social animals.

But that does not mean, in man's modern incarnation, that vengefulness is a hallmark of good mental health?

 

That point emerged strongly in a survey of Kosovo residents conducted in 2000. Scientists assessed the mental health and social functioning of 1,399 adults from 359 households in Kosovo roughly a year after a NATO air campaign ejected Serbian troops from the province. Kosovars, many of whom had fled or been harmed by Serbian troops, were asked about their feelings of hatred and revenge, their desire to act on those feelings, their history of trauma and their symptoms of mental illness and physical complaints.

The 2003 report found that feelings of revenge and hatred were strongest among those with the clearest signs of psychological stress and illness. And those with evident psychiatric illness were twice as likely as those without it to tell researchers they wanted to act on their vengeful feelings.

"The more traumatized someone is, the more they will seek or desire retribution," says George A. Bonanno, director of Columbia University's Loss, Trauma and Emotion Lab who has studied New Yorkers' responses to the events of Sept. 11.

But this doesn't automatically mean that revenge, when realized, will bring the anticipated catharsis. In fact, some academic experiments suggest otherwise: Carlsmith's research, for example, has found that individuals who are wronged -- tricked or cheated in a laboratory setting -- may believe that taking revenge on the perpetrator will feel really good, but if they act on the impulse they often find otherwise.

"When you actually carry out that revenge, you tend to feel worse than if you'd done nothing at all," Carlsmith said.

This could be because people who punish their offender spend more time ruminating about the offense and the person who perpetrated it, whereas those who do not punish tend to adjust their emotional reactions accordingly, downplaying or avoiding thoughts of the offense and moving on, Carlsmith and colleagues wrote in a 2008 study in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

The killing of Osama bin Laden in the context of a U.S. war on terror may be different, Carlsmith added; for one thing, the deed was done by professionals who signed up and trained for such bloody work. But the idea that not punishing is linked to moving on may explain why the event has reopened wounds in some who had set those feelings aside. With the trail of the terrorist mastermind gone cold, many Americans, including victims' family members, had turned their emotional energies to other tasks, including rebuilding their lives.

Betty Ann Miller of Milford, Conn., whose son, Michael Matthew Miller, died in the World Trade Center's Tower One on Sept. 11 2001, was one of those.

"I wasn't jubilant about it," says Miller of Osama bin Laden's death. "I was glad he was gone. But it was a sad day, because it brings everything back."

Fury may be one of the feelings brought back for many who experienced Sept. 11 as a national humiliation. To the extent that people support the U.S. action, they will rekindle their anger and outrage towards Osama bin Laden and possible affiliated people or organizations, Carlsmith said.

And then there is the matter of the nature of the punishment meted out. A swift death for Sept. 11's mastermind may prompt, for some, more dissatisfaction than closure. Many Americans last week compared bin Laden's end to the revenge fantasies they had nurtured, or to pain and suffering he inflicted on his victims -- and found it wanting.

Bin Laden scarcely suffered; he died surrounded by family, after living for years in comparative luxury; his body was cleaned and dispatched with respect for Muslim traditions; he will never know the fear and desolation of awaiting punishment.

Maureen Santora, whose firefighter son, Christopher, died at the World Trade Center site, spoke of her joy at the news of bin Laden's death. But along with other family members of those who perished in the attacks, she said she was dismayed that his body was sent to a watery grave.

Her first thought, she said, was that it should have been dumped unceremoniously atop New York's Fresh Kills Landfill, where the remains of the buildings he ordered destroyed mix with the city's garbage.

New York psychoanalyst Jeanne Safer, author of Forgiving and Not Forgiving, could smell the smoke and see the debris of the fallen World Trade Center towers from her office window on Sept. 11, 2001. Though she said she considers it her moral duty never to forgive Osama bin Laden, she added that persistent feelings of vengeance are a distraction and a crutch.

The problem with vengeance, Safer said, is that it's an effort to deny or undo an experience of suffering by turning the tables -- by making the victim the aggressor -- without working through the devastating feelings.

Safer said that many who sustained themselves with the hope of bin Laden's violent demise have never made sense of how their inner world changed on Sept. 11, 2001. The al-Qaida leader's death, inevitably, will leave those people tormented and dissatisfied, she said.

"People have a right to want justice," she said. "But vengeance really damages: because if you're busy celebrating, you haven't really dealt with how you felt."

 

-- Los Angeles Times.

 

true

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 14, 2011 J1

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.