Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Science, not politics, must decide pesticide debate

  • Print

DEAR EDITOR,

Manitoba Conservation Minister Gord Mackintosh indicated last week it was all but certain the government would implement a ban on urban pesticide use in the province. It appears as though he made up his mind before the public consultation period ending on Oct. 1 was over.

Send a Letter to the Editor

  • The Free Press welcomes letters from readers

    To send a letter for consideration on our Letters page: Fill out our online form at the link above, or Email letters@freepress.mb.ca, or Fax (204) 697-7412, or Mail Letters to the Editor, 1355 Mountain Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2X 3B6.

Mackintosh seemed to be speaking out of turn before Manitobans had their fair chance to voice their opinions. It was the government's responsibility to hold a fair and meaningful public-consultation process and not simply to go through the labour-intensive and costly administrative exercise with mind already made up. It appears the minister's bias has stood in the way of a proper consultation.

Important public-policy decisions shouldn't be made on a political whim, they should instead be based on sound science. Unfortunately, it looks like Mackintosh chose to base his decision on misinformation rather than the weight of scientific evidence.

The reality is pesticides are one of the most regulated products you will ever come across. Before any pesticide can be sold in Canada it must undergo an exhaustive and comprehensive scientific review and safety assessment by Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency, which is mandated to ensure the protection of human health and the environment.

Recognizing the need to continue to lead in the protection of human health, the federal government reviewed and updated pesticide legislation in 2006, providing Canadians with the strongest protection on a global scale. Specifically, pesticides undergo more than 200 separate tests addressing every possible health and environmental issue imaginable. Virtually no other product you will ever purchase has been subject to the same level of scientific scrutiny and regulatory oversight as pesticides.

The government should take a closer look at what is going on in other provinces. Take Quebec, for example. After nearly a decade of falsely claiming products containing 2,4-D are dangerous and denying its residents the ability to use such products, the Quebec government took a major step in 2011 by conceding that "products containing 2,4-D do not pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment."

Earlier this year, the British Columbia special committee on cosmetic pesticide use determined there was not enough scientific evidence to warrant a ban on the sale and use of urban pesticides in the province, affirming its confidence in the federal regulatory process. This decision came after the committee heard from a variety of witnesses, including those from Health Canada. Manitoba would have been well served to consult with Health Canada, the federal body that regulates the sale and use of pesticides.

The many Manitobans who want continued access to safe and effective pest-control tools to maintain their properties will be disappointed Mackintosh had his mind made up before the consultation process even began. We call on Premier Greg Selinger to step in and show leadership on this file by putting logic before politics.

DOUG CHORNEY

Keystone Agricultural Producers

East Selkirk

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 4, 2012 A9

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Gary Lawless & Ed Tait try not to bleeping cry over the woesome Jets

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • KEN GIGLIOTTI  WINNIPEG FREE PRESS / July 23 2009 - 090723 - Bart Kives story - Harry Lazarenko Annual River Bank Tour - receding water from summer rains and erosion  damage by flood  and ice  during spring flooding -  Red River , Lyndale Dr. damage to tree roots , river bank damage  , high water marks after 2009 Flood - POY
  • A young goose   reaches for long strands of grass Friday night near McGillvary Blvd-See Bryksa 30 Day goose challenge- Day 19 - May 23, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you support Pimicikamak First Nation's protest against Manitoba Hydro?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google