Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Boys' club rules female Olympians
The Vancouver Olympics Committee told the B.C. Supreme Court last week that it is an organization dedicated to the equality of women. It abides by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it continued, but unfortunately, when it comes to deciding what events will be held at the 2010 Vancouver Winter Games, its hands are tied; it is the International Olympic Committee that makes such decisions and also decides who competes in them.
In the matter before the court -- whether women's ski jumping should be an event next year -- VANOC asserts the charter does not apply because no government activity has taken place -- the contract is solely with the IOC.
Well, not really. VANOC stages the Games, and the IOC runs them along with international sport federations like the Federation Internationale de Ski, but the athletes are the activity of the Games and they compete on behalf of the nation in which they are citizens.
In fact, athletes cannot take part unless they are actively competing on behalf of their nation's government. Who would want any Canadian to go to the Olympics without complete and utter coverage of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms when it is the government that basks in the glory of their hard work?
VANOC has conveniently ignored that the Olympics are about athletes being active on behalf of their governments because they have spent the week disseminating IOC propaganda. For instance, even though the IOC is at the forefront of promoting equality, female ski jumpers cannot compete in 2010 because even a pro-woman organization like the IOC knows that women jumpers do not have what it takes to compete in elite Olympic competition.
Just because the IOC is composed mainly of aging men -- 94 of the 110 members are male -- and just because 61.7 per cent of athletes competing at the 2006 Turin Olympics were male, doesn't mean they aren't looking out for women.
And listen girls... err, women... just because there's only a "consensus statement" on sexual harassment and sexual assault, but no actual IOC policy on either, that's no reason for you, whose futures so depend on whether or not the powerful men in sport open or close doors, to think you're not going to be treated equally.
In 1997, the IOC established a minimum target of 20 per cent female membership for national Olympic committees so women would get into decision-making positions in various countries. Eleven years later, only 30 per cent of those committees had met the target, but it's a start, right? Maybe by the end of this century.
To ensure that women continue to receive such equality, the IOC instituted a women's commission. Who might some of these champions of feminism be? Well, there is HSH Prince Faisal bin Al-Hussein, head of the Jordanian Olympic Committee, who in 2004 became a lieutenant-general in the Royal Jordanian Air Force. He is joined by champion shooters Raja Randhir Singh of India and Gen. Mounir Sabet of Egypt, who is joined by Gen. Lassana Palenfo, a seasoned military man from the Ivory Coast.
Should they need any help-maidens with whom to consult, there are three princesses and one queen on this very busy commission that meets once a year.
VANOC member Walter Sieber filed a many-hundred-page affidavit listing all the wonderful things the IOC has done for women. He is also a member of the IOC's Olympic Games program commission. This commission of 14 men and two women was resurrected -- Sieber does not say when it last operated -- after women's bobsleigh and skeleton were added at the 2002 Salt Lake City Games because he says then-mayor Deedee Corradini lobbied for them.
Such a move, according to Sieber, who refers to himself and his commission as "impartial experts who make recommendations based on objective standards," threatened to "dilute the universality of the Olympics."
VANOC says it is the program commission that makes all decisions about what events are held at the Olympics and who can compete, and women's ski jumping is not on the list.
There is a piece missing in Sieber's logic. If the IOC cares so much about the equality of women, why are there still no canoeing events for women at the Games? Why seven cycling track events for men and three for women? Why force female beach volleyball players to limit their bikini bottoms to a maximum of seven centimetres at the hip? Beach volleyball has a "control committee" that athletes must get permission from to even put on a sweatshirt during competition.
VANOC knew ski jumping was not yet a sport for women at the Olympics, and made a deal with the oldest boys' club on the planet anyway.
Former Olympic swimmer and medallist from the 1968 Mexico Olympics, Marion Lay, says that in the 48 years she has worked for equality for women in sport, the fact that women ski jumpers in 2009 have to go to court just to have the right to compete makes these days the saddest of her life.
"If someone had told me back in 1972 when I started the women's program at Sport Canada that we'd still have to argue for fundamental rights nearly 50 years later, I just would not have believed them," she said as she left the Supreme Court.
Laura Robinson, a former member of the national cycling team, is an author and freelance writer.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 26, 2009 A15
More The View from the West
- Back to Top
- Return to The View from the West
Most Popular The View from the West
- Obama's ad a brilliant political pivot
- Thompson still hockey backwater
- Iraq had too much past, too little present
- Confessions of a Winnipeg sidewalk cyclist
- Expatriate Canadians fight to keep the vote
- The world we know, the world we knew
- Sports and the primitive man
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Quebec students' credibility problem
- It's a 'disease,' the studies agree
- Quebec students' credibility problem
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Oleson made world more interesting
- It's a 'disease,' the studies agree
- Grab a java and you might just live forever
- When vigilantes are morality police
- Caving to half-baked birther clowns shames Arizona
- It's an economy, not a 'disease'
- Pesticide bans do backfire
- Obama's ad a brilliant political pivot
- Potential conflict in Brandon deepens
- Oleson made world more interesting
- The Bay is key to downtown renewal
- The birth of a banana republic
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Brandon folk society's friends in high places
- Quebec students' credibility problem
- Now that's dense: Zoning regulations hinder development of great neighbourhoods in city
- Raise the lowered bar for math
- UN to investigate Canada's broken food system
- Egyptian vote bad for Israel
- Pesticide bans do backfire
- Oleson made world more interesting
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- The 'dreams of a barefoot boy' cut down to size
- Angry B.C. teachers take aim at students
- The decline of common sense
- Play's the thing to catch conscience of Parliament
- NATO lacks rules on drones
- English language rules the world
- Oleson made world more interesting
- Election to resolve issues in Israel
- Syria beats back its rivals
- Political climate in Jordan boiling
- Egyptian vote bad for Israel
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Heart health not just a numbers game
- The birth of a banana republic
- Potential conflict in Brandon deepens
- It takes people to raise a Village
Ads by Google









You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010; View the changes. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.