The View from the West
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Canada's EU trade talks catch U.S. attention
The heft of the larger European countries, it reasoned, would restrain the growing clout of the United States.
Rebuffed, Canada was drawn firmly into America's orbit. Sixty years on it has come back with a scaled-down plan, starting talks on Wednesday with the EU aimed at a bilateral trade agreement.
You can see why Canada would want to lessen its dependence on America, which bought 75.5 per cent of its exported goods last year and provided 63.4 per cent of its imported ones.
Yanked into recession by America, Canada worries that trade will suffer from protectionism (in the form of new Buy American provisions and country-of-origin labelling requirements on farm products) and Washington's moves to toughen up border security.
It is less clear what motivates the EU, which traded a mere $103 billion with Canada last year.
The EU did more than five times as much trade with China in 2007 and more than 10 times as much with America.
The estimated increase in bilateral trade of $35 billion annually, once the deal has been in place seven years, appears modest.
According to Catherine Ashton, the EU trade commissioner, by talking about trade liberalization amid rising global protectionism, the two parties are sending a "powerful signal."
Yet they are also sending a worrying message about confidence in the Doha round of global trade talks.
In 2006, Canada and the EU had put talks on a trade and investment treaty on hold pending the outcome of Doha.
Starting talks is easier than finishing them. Most Canada-EU goods trade is already tariff-free, which means the barriers left standing, such as those on farm products, are the hardest to knock down.
And there is always the danger that small trade spats, such as the one touched off on Tuesday when the European Parliament voted to ban the import of seal products, could fester and infect the broader talks.
Still, the prospect of a successful outcome caught the attention of American business.
The National Association of Manufacturers called on the Obama administration to negotiate a United States-EU agreement or risk being the only partner in the North American Free-Trade Agreement left out (Mexico signed one in 2000).
That 60-year-old Canadian dream of stronger transatlantic economic ties may yet come true.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 8, 2009 A12
- Rate this

-
-
We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.
You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.
Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.
Post Your Comment
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
-
Faith Enduring
A look at Manitoba’s Ukrainian community through their churches
-
The Forgotten Disease
The fight to eradicate tuberculosis is far from over.
-
Flu Fight
News about the world's battle against the H1N1 flu pandemic
-
Follow the Way!
Join United Way on its journey toward lasting change and better lives.
-
Winnipeg road closures
Check if your commute is affected
-
Editor's Bulletin
Sign up for daily bulletins
-
Blogs to Watch
We pick our favourite local blogs for you to follow
-
Breaking News Widget
Create and embed a Winnipeg Free Press breaking news widget on your site or blog
- Back to Top
- Return to The View from the West
Advertisement
Most Popular
- Sod turned at IKEA site today
- Manitoba man killed in crash in Nebraska
- Horror at the movies? That's the snack booth
- Jury finds man guilty in execution-style slaying
- Rush hour crash closes Wilkes
- Southern chiefs blast Hydro
- Woman charged in year-old homicide case
- Will you get the H1N1 flu vaccine?
- Police looking for missing girls
- Winnipeg trucker killed in crash in Nebraska
- Southern chiefs blast Hydro
- Sod turned at IKEA site today
- Find lukewarm lovers who fit your style
- Activists protest delay over Kapyong housing
- Province takes aim at stubble fires
- Horror at the movies? That's the snack booth
- Ignatieff, McFadyen do the shuffle dance
- Rush hour crash closes Wilkes
- Addicts out in cold: workers
- Jury finds man guilty in execution-style slaying
- Sod turned at IKEA site today
- Horror at the movies? That's the snack booth
- Southern chiefs blast Hydro
- Health Canada warns vets and pet owners about drug used to treat diabetes
- Activists protest delay over Kapyong housing
- Mortgage rates likely to rise soon
- Children helping children is charity's goal
- 300 homes evacuated, schools closed after heavy rain, high tide flood Duncan, BC
- Asthma appears to be significant risk factor in kids for severe H1N1: study
- Addicts out in cold: workers
Ads by Google


PREVIOUS

1 Comments
Posted by: rck
May 8, 2009 at 8:32 AM
It is less clear what motivates the EU, which traded a mere $103 billion with Canada last year.
The EU did more than five times as much trade with China in 2007 and more than 10 times as much with America.
Shouldn't a nation's capacity to trade with the EU be given some context as to it's population (and thus ability to produce)? The United States traded 10 times more with the European Union, but the United States is ten times larger than Canada, therefore our level of trade was about the same per capita. I'm also curious what the writer would consider a significant amount, $103 billion is nothing to sneeze at.