Winnipeg Free Press > Opinion > The View from the West > How low Tories go

The View from the West

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

How low Tories go

By: Frances Russell

25/11/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 8

Canada's ruling Conservatives crossed two lines last week.

To protect their image, Defence Minister Peter MacKay led an all-out assault on the reputation of career diplomat Richard Colvin even as he was conceding the 2007 reversal on Afghan detainee transfers happened in part because of Colvin's warnings about torture.

And they exploited anti-Semitism without regard for the pain and distress raising this spectre inflicts on the Canadian Jewish community.

The Conservatives targeted five opposition ridings containing large numbers of Jewish voters with political flyers using classic propaganda tools of half-truths and innuendo to smear Liberals as anti-Semitic and anti-Israel.

As Jews and Zionists, whose daughter served in the Israeli Army, Irwin and Ariela Cotler are uniquely qualified to articulate the mixture of outrage and alarm this kind of wedge politics causes in its victims. Irwin Cotler is a former Liberal justice minister who attended the 2001 United Nations anti-racism conference mentioned in the Conservative flyer. Ariela Cotler briefly quit the Liberal Party in 2006 after then-leadership candidate Michael Ignatieff called Israel's bombing of a Lebanese village a war crime. She returned to the party after Ignatieff apologized and withdrew his statement.

Speaking on a motion of privilege on Nov. 19, Cotler denounced as "false, misleading, prejudicial and pernicious slander" Conservative claims that Liberals willingly participated in the UN conference that became a platform for anti-Israeli sentiment.

Pointing out that Israel had asked Canada to remain at Durban to "bear witness" and report the conference's anti-Semitic overtones, Cotler continued: "The Government of Israel publicly commended Canada for Canada's condemnation of anti-Semitism at Durban 1. Does that mean the Government of Israel, by supporting the Government of Canada, was also identifying with anti-Semitism? What kind of absurdity is that coming out of the members of the Conservative government. This is as absurd as it is false."

Cotler had equally strong words for the Conservative accusation the Liberals opposed de-funding Hamas and asked for Hezbollah to be delisted as a terrorist organization. It was the Liberal government that listed both Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations in 2002. "For shame," Cotler continued. Funding both "was illegal under Canadian law from 2002 onward...How can they take credit that after 2006 they de-funded Hamas? My God, there has to be some respect for truth and some respect for honesty."

In a letter published in the National Post Nov. 21, Ariela Cotler countered every half-truth in the flyer with the offsetting fact it ignored. Then she went to the heart of what is so destructive and dangerous about wedge politics:

"It is presumptuous enough to presume that Canadian Jews only vote on these issues -- regardless of concerns over health care, the environment, social justice, poverty -- and that they vote as a bloc.

"In fact, so far as I know, no other religious community in our riding has been so targeted. But even on the 'Jewish values' issue, the flyer is a series of false and arguably slanderous statements...I condemn the Conservative party for its disinformation."

NDP MP Paul Dewar (Ottawa Centre) calls the flyers "boiler-plate wedge politics...It poisons the well of our political culture."

Retired University of Manitoba historian D.N. Sprague has described such tactics as "the paranoid style of politics." Paranoid or status politics play in the incendiary arena of the self-images of individuals and groups and their power relationships with each other. Status politics easily drown out the interest politics of rational debate on bread and butter realities like jobs and the economy.

Because status politics "stimulate the exposed nerve"' of rivalry based on race, colour, religion, language, class or region, they can unleash antagonisms that have no limit, Sprague says. They are most prevalent during periods of social and economic stress. People who are insecure search for scapegoats, fellow citizens who are different, for example, in language, religion or region, and who are perceived to be better off in some way, prospering at their expense and somehow conspiring to block their opportunity for power, financial success or recognition. Status politics are especially perilous for their perennial target, minorities.

If this is how low the Conservatives go when they are riding high in the polls, imagine what they will stoop to if their grip on power is actually threatened.

Frances Russell is a Winnipeg author and political commentator.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 25, 2009 A15

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 4 out of 5 (4 votes).

    • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

8 Commentscomment icon

The biggest problem for the Liberals (and liberals) is that they are always trying to be fair. They tend to want ALL the facts before defending or condemning. The conservatives are never burdened with such conundrums. They know what's right because god and Mr. Harper TELL them what's right. Can the conservatives sink any lower? Just watch them.

In response to your last question Ms. Russell, the Cons dealt an enormous body blow to our democracy and attempted tear the nation in half in December 2008.

Of course Russell agrees with the Liberals on this. The fact is that nobody accused the Liberals of being anti-Semetic, just anti-Israel. If Liberals want to interrpret that as anti-Semetism, thats fine. But the Liberals and Frances Russell consitantly come out against Israel, and in defense of terrorists and other unsavory characters. Until they can articulate WHY this is, the Conservatives should continue to drive these facts home.

The attack on Colvin's credibility is, of course, outrageous. So is the 10%-er slandering Irwin Cotler, Ignatieff and the Liberal Party.

The biggest shocker is that these things are being done by the same people who are running our country. This not some two-bit group of misfits operating on the fringe of our society, not now since they got into power anyway.

If I were Cotler I would be talking to my lawyer right now about launching a libel suit against Harper, the Con Party, Vic Toews or whomever it is that is responsible.

Harper and the Con's have developed the biggest propaganda machine seen in Western democracies in recent history that they have no hesitation in using no matter how reprehensible and morally and secularly dishonest, approaching Canadians on an emotional level, with a total disregard for the truth.

Harper and the Con's are only concerned with grabbing onto power and maintaining it, at any cost, and Canada be damned.

Also, one can only wonder to what extent, given the huge amounts of tax payers money, as well as Con Party money, Harper spends on media - central to the smooth running of their propaganda machine, the Harper and Con largess is tied to media that publish pro-Con materials.

With a Press that is willing to write articles in an open, informative, objective manner such as this one, all Canadians will see Harper and his Con's for what they really are.

Excerpt:
Lloyd MacIlquham cicblog

So, Russell is appalled that the Cons could smear the Libs as anti-semitic. The Libs (and the MSM) have been smearing the Tories (and Albertans) as racist for years. Suddenly, these
tactics are unacceptable. How predictable.

A lot of high profile people in western countries and indeed many Israeli citizens are on record for condemning heavy-handed behaviour by Israel against Palestinians. There's nothing anti-semitic about this. Would you really rather have a leader who "unquestioningly (unthinkingly) supports" another country, or would you rather our leaders use their brains and give support where it's deserved?

Nonetheless, Ms Russell's point is centred on the Conservative predilection for smear, and the politics of the gutter. Would you say these flyers are a good use of taxpayer's money? Would you say they have a genuine value as instructional material? Do you think the government has acted correctly in attacking Richard Colvin?

I for one would love them to be in full power, just to read more of this liberal, conservative-hating, bleeding heart tripe.

I guess this columnist cannot write her own columns. She has a distinct habit of filling her columns with the quotes of others.
The fact is the Liberal party is on record and particularly Iffy in condemning the actions of Israel in their fight with Hezbollah.
In fact who can forget Denis Coderre and Gilles Duceppe marching with Hezbollah supporters in Quebec.
So Russell should get off her high horse and call a spade a spade instead of trying to defend the indefensible.
The Libs want to straddle the fence all the time. Harper stands up and is counted in his unquestionable defense of Israel.

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Poll

Would you pay more to supersize your garbage bin?

View Results