The View from the West

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

It's gross, all right; the charge that is

By: Carson Jerema

30/11/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 4

In a fit of asinine hyperbole, the University of British Columbia Alma Mater Society appears to have accused Canada of crimes against humanity. The charge? Tuition fees are too high. Canada, the AMS says, has failed to meet international obligations to provide "equally accessible" higher education. Last week, the society filed a complaint with the United Nations Human Rights Council, alleging prohibitive costs for disadvantaged groups.

The submission features a litany of old grievances about high tuition and education funding, but quickly goes off the rails.

"We submit," the AMS writes, that the B.C. and federal "governments have engaged in a consistent pattern of gross human rights violations."

The AMS, UBC's students' union, wants an independent expert or special rapporteur to look into the matter.

Now, forget the fact that the AMS offers virtually no evidence demonstrating that high tuition is an impediment to accessibility. Enrolment has remained steady among all income groups since the early 1990s when tuition began to rise dramatically.

And, forget the murkiness of claiming higher education is a universal right. Wouldn't universality also entail extending educational opportunities to those who fail to meet academic standards?

Accusing a country of "gross human rights violations" should be a serious issue, and not the expression of a fantasy that equates Canada with some violent dictatorship.

There is some debate over what the difference is between a "gross" violation of rights, and a garden variety violation, but over the 1990s consensus congealed around a few key points.

A gross human rights violation includes, as outlined in a 1993 paper presented to the UN Economic and Social Council: "Genocide, slavery and slavery-like practices, summary or arbitrary executions, torture, disappearances, arbitrary and prolonged detention, and systematic discrimination."

Comparatively lesser violations such as infringements on due process, free expression and other civil and political rights are no doubt serious, but it would be insulting to equate them with genocide and torture. Identifying a human rights violation as gross is usually reserved for conflicts in Darfur or the Congo, or with Apartheid South Africa, not with the tuition policy of the peaceable Canada.

Apparently to bolster their case, the AMS complaint includes an impact statement from a Tristan Markle to demonstrate the negative consequences of rising tuition. It is not entirely clear what the point of Markle's statement is.

In his impact statement, Markel claims that he is $42,000 in debt. But, this was after he initially graduated with a degree (and no debt) from the University of Toronto while living at home.

Markel's debts accumulated when he chose to move to Vancouver where he completed a second program. After graduating in May of this year, he found a "suitable" job in four months.

Yet because of his debt, he argues, he "will not be able to attend graduate school as soon as (he) would like."

Are we to feel sorry for Markel? He has completed two university programs and has been successful in finding work in a tight job market. What does this have to do with university accessibility? And how exactly is postponing graduate school for a few years representative of a gross violation of human rights?

So, does the AMS really believe that Canada's tuition policy is equitable with torture? Maybe. I don't know. What does seem clear is that they, like anti-tuition advocates everywhere, view people who choose not to go to university as a poverty-inflicted mass, who desperately want to pursue post-secondary education. All they need is a $500 reduction in tuition fees.

Anti-tuition advocates appear to be so impressed with their educational experience that they think naturally everyone else wants to emulate them. If they don't, there must be something gravely wrong. This is not a reflection of empathy for the disadvantaged. It is narcissism.

Carson Jerema has an MA in politics and is a former editor of The Manitoban.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 30, 2009 A15

Rate this
This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

4 Comments

Posted by: Andrew Bonner

December 1, 2009 at 6:23 AM

I agree with Longplainfirstnation. Education should be free at point of delivery.

Report abusive comment

Posted by: ashleyel

November 30, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Hi there,

Just FYI - this whole thing was done without the consent of the AMS Council or UBC students; the President and VP External took it upon themselves to deceive everybody and submit this unbenownst to any of us.

Subsequently, this past Saturday night there was an extraordinary AMS meeting in which motions passed to retract this complaint, and to ask for the President and VP External to resign.

Please do not take this to mean that all UBC students and student politicians are delusional and silly; only 2 of them!

Report abusive comment

Posted by: MatthewN

November 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM

I am a member of the Student Council of the AMS, and I wanted to say that this was not the action of the AMS, but rather the President and VP External using the name of our student society for their own ends. This action without consulting the Council or informing anyone. It was in contravention of current AMS policy. Nobody found out about this complaint until after it was filed.

On Saturday night the Council held an Emergency Meeting where they unanimously voted to retract and disavow the complaint. We also unanimously asked for the resignations of Blake Frederick and Tim Chu, the executives in question, and initiated proceedings to recall them from their positions, which, if they don't resign, will take place at a meeting next week.

The AMS is opposed to tuition increases above the cost of inflation, and has a much more nuanced policy than is implied by these executives. I hope that you don't paint everyone at the AMS, or everyone at UBC, with the same brush.

Report abusive comment

Posted by: longplainfirstnation

November 30, 2009 at 8:15 AM

School should be available to everyone and any time in their life no matter what their financial circumstances and it is not.

It appears were training more and more migrants and less Canadians. Migrants who leave Canada and never contribute to it's growth and prosperity.

Were cutting our own throat in a slow painful manner and it will lead to our slow demise.