The View from the West

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Jordan, Israel adrift

By: Samuel Segev

27/10/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 2

11Twelve years ago, during his first term as prime minister, Netanyahu approved the Mash'al assassination. Two Mossad agents entered Jordan with Canadian passports and injected Mash'al with a nerve toxin. Then-Jordanian King Hussein demanded an antidote, and his son Abdullah, who later assumed his father's throne, was the commando commander that threatened to storm the Israeli embassy in Amman.

Under pressure from the U.S., and in order to save Israeli-Jordanian relations, Netanyahu eventually relented, the 1994 Israeli-Jordanian peace was saved, but Hussein and Abdullah never forgot and never trusted Netanyahu again.

This suspicion was evident in Israel on Monday when Jordan toned down all events to mark 15 years of peace between the two countries.

The anniversary was marked only by a symposium at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, with very limited Jordanian participation.

Indeed, 15 years after they signed the peace treaty on Oct. 26, 1994, Israel and Jordan look like a couple who lost interest in each other. They remain "married" only because of their joint assets, especially in Jerusalem's holy places.

In their peace accord, Israel granted Jordan a special role in the Holy Christian and Muslim sites in East Jerusalem.

Jordan follows with great suspicion the growing involvement of Israeli extremist Muslims in the violence around al-Aqsa mosque, and suspects that Israeli Arabs, in collaboration with West Bank Muslims, are trying to push it from its special role.

All of King Abdullah's anger is directed at Netanyahu. In an interview with the Italian daily La Republica, King Abdullah is quoted as saying: "When Netanyahu was elected to a second term as prime minister, he came to see me in Amman. He made several promises, none of them was kept."

Indeed, Israeli-Jordanian relations are today in deep freeze. Except for the security co-operation, no civilian joint project is being built; no joint airport in Eilat-Aqaba; no joint seaport in Aqaba.

The Red Sea-Dead Sea canal, which Jordan hopes will save the Dead Sea, is going nowhere.

Under the terms of the peace agreement, Israel supplies Jordan with water from the Jordan river. Drought, however, has created a scarcity of water in both countries that is not being relieved by planned desalination plants that remain "under study."

In day-to-day life, the average Jordanian doesn't feel any improvement in his standard of living. Unemployment is growing -- officially, it stands at 12.5 per cent, unofficially it's more than 20 per cent. Poverty -- especially outside of Amman -- is painful.

For all these reasons, there is growing opposition to the peace with Israel. Recently, 35 members of the Jordanian parliament signed a petition calling on King Abdullah to abandon the peace with Israel. Demonstrators in Amman Monday chanted the same slogan.

More serious is the lack of strategic co-ordination between the two countries to face future regional challenges.

For example, nobody knows what will be the impact of the withdrawal from Iraq and who will fill the vacuum created by the hasty American withdrawal from the Iraqi cities. Can Iraq defend itself against joint Iranian-Syrian subversion? If not, how would this impact on Jordan's stability? Could Jordan's King Abdullah block the wave of Iraqi refugees into his country?

All these problems have a direct effect on Israel's security.

On many occasions in the past, Israel assured kings Hussein and Abdullah that an independent Jordan is a "strategic asset" for Israel. This definition is still valid.

But one wonders why there is no strategic dialogue between Israel and Jordan?

If Israel doesn't wake up and move immediately to save its peace with Jordan, it could wake up one day to realize that King Abdullah is looking for another, more promising alliance.

Samuel Segev is the Winnipeg Free Press Middle East correspondent.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 27, 2009 A11

Rate this
This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

2 Comments

Posted by: Isabella

October 28, 2009 at 9:02 AM

On another note, I feel that Jordan has no right to be angry at Israel, the Arab state of Jordan should be thankful, it’s not even a legitimate state, Jordan was created on baseless grounds, and it’s a fake state!
Jordan occupies most of former Palestine land, it occupies the land that should have belonged to the Jews, and Jordan has absolutely no legitimate rights to the land it occupies, historically, it has no rights.
Their arrogance doesn’t stop there, not only did Jordan stole part of the Jewish Holy Land, the Arabs seek to establish a second Arab state, an “official” Palestinian state! Everybody knows that Palestinians already have a state- Jordan. It situated on Palestine land. Most of Jordan’s citizens call themselves palestinians. The palestinians also fought to make Jordan their official home- Remember the events of Black September!
During Black September, palestinian liberation groups fought to make Jordan their home, and Jordan ended up killing about 10,000 palestinians! Jordan was meant to be a Palestinian state and it is! It occupies former Palestine land!

Report abusive comment

Posted by: Isabella

October 28, 2009 at 9:01 AM

After reading this article, I get the same impression I always get, the way the Middle East conflict is always approached, I mean to say that Israel always has to assume all the responsibility, it's like a disagreement between an adult and a child, Israel the adult figure always has to resolve the problem for the child (Arab states).

Conversely, the Arabs always resort to the same habit, every time the Arab states have a problem (and they have problems all the time), like for instance poverty and draught in Jordan.... What does Jordan do to fix the problem? It doesn’t do anything, instead like every other Arab state it redirects its focus to Israel, and it vents its anger at Israel. Why? I guess its easier being angry and doing nothing, blaming others for your miseries... So they think, okay lets shift the focus from the poverty, let’s start a war with Israel.... For once, I would like to see the Arab states take some responsibility, I’m not talking about them making peace with their neighbours, that’s expecting too much, but at least the Arab states could start caring more about their own people, they could at least start fixing their own internal problems.
I mean I get the double standard always directed at Israel, it’s like people expect more from Israel because it has moral agency which the Arab states don’t have. Still I wish the Arab states would start practicing some responsibility.