Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Peace treaty in peril
TEL AVIV -- Egypt inaugurated on Monday its newly elected and Muslim-dominated parliament that will redefine the role of Islam in Egypt's Second Republic.
The emergence of political Islam began in Tunis, when a liberal Muslim scholar won the Oct. 23, 2011, elections. It was followed in Morocco on Nov. 25 and Monday was Egypt's turn.
The new turn in Egyptian politics coincides with a major change in American Middle Eastern policy. On Nov. 25, the administration of President Barack Obama shifted its public position on the continuing standoff between the Egyptian army and the liberal demonstrators in Cairo's Tahrir Square.
Obama urged a full transfer of power to a civilian government "as soon as possible." Obama came to the conclusion that he needed a new Middle Eastern policy that would meet the aspirations of the Egyptian people for human rights and democracy. The Obama administration appears to have accepted now that any future Egyptian government will have to share power with the Muslim Brotherhood.
But the U.S. did not expect that the young liberals who started the revolution and forced the ouster of former president Hosni Mubarak would be decimated in the parliamentary elections.
They won only seven seats in the 498-member parliament. Nor did Washington expect that the Muslim Brotherhood and the more extremist Salafist movement would practically dominate the new parliament.
According to official figures, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists together won close to 67 per cent of the vote, while the Christian Copts -- who constitute 10 per cent of the population -- are largely under-represented in the new parliament.
In its inaugural session Monday, the Muslim Brotherhood leader, Saad el-Katatni, was elected as the new speaker. The new speaker said that the parliament will chose 19 parliamentary committees, where the real parliamentary work will be conducted.
The new parliament will now appoint a 100-member Constitutional Committee that will draft a new constitution and pave the way for presidential elections, to be held on June 12. Until then, the interim government of Kamal el-Janzouri will remain in place.
Israel and many other countries have been following closely the Egyptian elections. Russia and China were among the first big powers that rushed to Cairo and promised assistance in facilitating the transfer from military autocracy to popular democracy. The U.S. promised to continue its annual $1.3 billion in aid for the Egyptian military.
Israel's case is different. Experience has shown that a revolution might produce a popular government, but that does not necessarily mean a liberal democratic government, as practised in the West. Since the elections, and even before, Muslim Brotherhood leaders have repeatedly said that their Islamic-oriented government will honour the 1979 Camp David accords and the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty.
The sad truth, however, is that this peace treaty has become meaningless. Since the capture of the Israeli embassy, Egyptian landlords refuse to rent a place for the new embassy and the Israeli ambassador is forced to conduct his diplomatic work from home. Even then, the work is very limited, since Egyptian officials repeatedly tell the ambassador that they are busy. Hence, the ambassador's routine diplomacy is limited to meetings with other diplomats, especially the Americans. Furthermore, Muslim Brotherhood leaders are repeatedly hinting that Israel should understand that things in Egypt have changed and that Israel should show more understanding of Palestinians' aspirations.
In practical terms, the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty is dead. People-to-people contacts are non-existent, commercial ties are minimal and gas supply to Israel is frequently interrupted because of sabotage to the gas pipeline in Sinai.
As for the Palestinian problem, Egypt is now trying to reconcile Fatah and Hamas, and once this is achieved, it intends to launch a "Palestinian initiative" the nature of which will certainly not be to Israel's liking.
But what concerns Israel most is the likely dangers emanating from Egypt's lack of control of the Sinai desert. Since the 1948 war, when the Muslim Brotherhood sent volunteers to fight against Israel, there has been no military confrontation between Israel and the Brotherhood. On the contrary. In October 1954, the Muslim Brotherhood was outlawed in Egypt after a failed attempt to assassinate former president Gamal Abdul Nasser.
This situation remained in force during the Sadat and Mubarak administrations.
Now, the Muslim Brotherhood controls Egyptian politics. Israeli officials do not expect a formal repudiation of the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty. But the new Egyptian regime has other options, and not all of them are reassuring.
Samuel Segev is the Free Press Middle East correspondent.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 24, 2012 A11
- Back to Top
- Return to The View from the West
Poll
Most Popular The View from the West
- Criticism of Hydro disappoints
- Report underlines feckless profligacy of provincial government
- Oilsands as 'carbon bomb' debunked
- Who will crash if F-35 program goes down?
- Islamist successes more surprising than threatening
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Israel wise to heed American pressure
- Obituaries —the long and the short of them
- Dividing line is real in Africa
- Myths about Riel hide the man
- Myths about Riel hide the man
- Who will crash if F-35 program goes down?
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba drivers get free ride on gas tax
- Basketball phenom 'confirms' Asian stereotype
- Enbridge pipeline bad for the economy
- They knew drug war was wrong
- Manitoba could join Minnesota in 175-km/h rail link
- Force of nature unheralded, unforgettable
- Air going out of war in Afghanistan
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Flood is not over, nor is the fight
- Myths about Riel hide the man
- Force of nature unheralded, unforgettable
- Fired environmentalist sees conspiracy
- Harper shrewdly dodges vision thing
- Canada exports jobs along with its oil
- Tell China to stop slave labour
- Feels like it's 1985 all over again
- It's time to push Manitoba Hydro's 'pause' button
- Criticism of Hydro disappoints
- Israel wise to heed American pressure
- Report underlines feckless profligacy of provincial government
- Israel wise to heed American pressure
- Force of nature unheralded, unforgettable
- Enbridge pipeline bad for the economy
- Myths about Riel hide the man
- Criticism of Hydro disappoints
- Métis of convenience, or conviction?
- In praise of the good inner city landlords
- 'No plans' to privatize, then and now
- War tale needs love angle
- Sauce for bus riders is sauce for car drivers
- Peace treaty in peril
- Obama torn by conflicting allies
- Time, it appears, is on Assad's side
- Russian arms used in slaughter of civilians in Syria
- Flood is not over, nor is the fight
- Harper creating 13 kinds of citizens
- It's time to push Manitoba Hydro's 'pause' button
- Education faculties should disappear
- First Nation co-signs away housing issue
- Israel wise to heed American pressure
Ads by Google








You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010; View the changes. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.