Winnipeg Free Press > Opinion > The View from the West > Why race to the moon?

The View from the West

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Why race to the moon?

Because its surface holds enough helium-3 to generate electricity for '10,000 years'

By: Tom Simko

13/09/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 4

Artist�s rendering of Japan�s first lunar probe.

CP Enlarge Image

Artist�s rendering of Japan�s first lunar probe.

The race is on to return to the moon, and this time America has a new set of rivals: Japan, China and India. At stake is access to a new and clean source of energy buried in the grey lunar soil -- helium-3, which could be used to power fusion reactors in the near future.

NASA intends to send astronauts to the moon by 2020 with the Constellation Program, the replacement for the space shuttles. The Ares I rocket will bring astronauts up to Earth orbit where their capsule will rendezvous with a lunar lander launched aboard the massive Ares V. The combined ship will then take off for the moon. NASA plans to eventually establish lunar bases.

This ambitious plan is attracting criticism and already running into trouble.

Although the space shuttles are expected to be retired next year, the Ares I won't be ready until 2015 -- just before the planned end of the space station project. In the interim, America will have to send its astronauts up on Russian spacecraft.

A presidential review of American human spaceflight plans has just reported that NASA has inadequate funds to reach the moon by 2020. About 10 years later could be more realistic. The report also casts doubt on using the two different Ares rocket systems to replace the shuttle, and it states that the Ares I will probably be delayed until 2017.

This confusion and uncertainty are eroding America's leadership in space and being met with serious competition from Asia.

The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has announced plans to put an astronaut on the moon by 2030. Japan is paving the way for this mission with its Kaguya spacecraft, which has been orbiting the moon since October 2007, taking high-definition images of the surface and, along with two smaller probes, obtaining data to answer questions about the formation of the moon. This mission will be followed in 2015 by Kaguya 2 for further investigations with a rover on the surface.

Japan has significant manned spaceflight experience. Six of its astronauts have flown aboard the space shuttles, and one of them has spent 4 1/2 months aboard the International Space Station.

Japan is also the only Asian partner in the space station. It has gained useful experience from its contributions to the project.

China is another strong challenger to NASA. Its Chang'e 1 satellite orbited the moon for 16 months, mapping the landscape and resources before crashing into the surface in March. This was the first step in China's three-stage moon project. The next one involves landing a probe on the surface by 2012, followed by the final stage of putting a rover there and bringing back rock and soil samples by 2017. China, which has expressed a strong interest in putting a man on the moon, is the only Asian nation to have launched its own astronauts into orbit, having done so with three times since 2003.

The Indian Space Research Organization, meanwhile, has proposed putting an astronaut in orbit by 2015, will soon establish an astronaut training centre and already is talking about an eventual manned mission to the moon.

India's Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft slipped into lunar orbit last November. Until contact was lost last month, the satellite investigated the distribution of chemicals and minerals and mapped the entire surface to a resolution of five to 10 metres. India reached out and touched the lunar surface by intentionally crash-landing a small probe from its orbiter.

The multinational probes orbiting the moon have been searching for water and useful minerals to locate ideal spots for bases. These surveys are also uncovering a resource so valuable it could justify lunar mining: helium-3. This special form of helium could be used for nuclear fusion.

Unlike conventional nuclear reactors that split uranium atoms, fusion reactors -- currently in the experimental stage -- combine smaller atoms like hydrogen.

If nuclear fusion becomes a viable source of energy, helium-3 will be an ideal fuel. When used with deuterium (a type of hydrogen), only low-level radioactive waste is left behind from side-reactions. Helium-3 is a compact, relatively clean and powerful energy source.

Carried away from the sun with the solar wind, helium-3 is very rare on Earth because it is deflected by the planet's magnetic field. On the unshielded moon, however, it has accumulated in the lunar soil over the eons, ready to be scooped up, processed and brought to Earth.

Just a few a tonnes of helium-3 would satisfy the energy needs of Canada for a year.

Although practical nuclear fusion could be decades away, it makes sense to start developing the capability of getting to the moon to collect helium-3 for the reactors of the future.

The Japanese, Chinese and Indian space agencies have acknowledged the importance of obtaining helium-3 from the moon. All of these nations are also investing in fusion research. They are partners in the seven-member International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor project, and Japan and China have developed their own experimental fusion reactors.

China's state-run Xinhua News Agency quotes the chief scientist of the nation's lunar program, Ouyang Ziyuan, as saying, "We will explore the new energy prospects on the moon for mankind... When obtaining nuclear power from helium-3 becomes a reality, the resource on the moon can be used to generate electricity for more than 10,000 years for the whole world."

China, Japan and India have good reason to explore fusion and to ensure access to lunar helium-3 fuel. After America, these countries are the second-, third- and fifth-largest oil consumers in the world. By 2025, America and its Asian space rivals are predicted to be the top-four net importers of oil.

While this second race to the moon might seem like a step backward (after all, it's been done before), it could in fact be a bold leap toward a clean energy source to save Earth from more global warming.

Such common interests and the astronomical costs of space travel could prompt international co-operation in reaching the moon. The U.S. human spaceflight review recommends that NASA explore space with international partners. This could make more resources available and benefit foreign relations.

As China, Japan and India also come to realize the true costs and challenges of establishing separate lunar programs, they might agree to a collaborative effort with America. Fortunately, an excellent example of international co-operation in space already exists: the space station.

Tom Simko, an engineer living in Brockville, Ont., writes about space for the Winnipeg Free Press.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 13, 2009 A12

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.

    • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

4 Commentscomment icon

Jay,I have looked it up and it is not promising right now. There are so many barriers for fusion with H-1 and H-2. As for aneutronic fusion, I don't see it happening in the near future. Even if it is possible, the are great doubts because of the extreme conditions for the reactions to take place. I know fusion can be tamed but it will be a very long time. And right now, to trip to the moon for the purpose of He-3 seems silly to me. When it comes down to energy production, we are stuck with what we have for the moment.

climber, it's not as if controlled nuclear fusion hasn't been achieved. Sure it has -- it's just that it hasn't been done efficiently enough to generate net power output. But otherwise, even small tabletop experiments can cause hydrogen nuclei to fuse -- look up 'pyrofusion' -- again, it's just that it doesn't produce more energy than it uses up to make it happen. With Helium-3, most of the energy is coming out in the form of regular Helium-4 nuclei plus protons, all of which are charged particles whose energy can be captured and put back into the system. That gives it a much higher chance of going past breakeven on energy output, as compared to fusion of hydrogen. But of course, people are saying the same thing about p+B reaction as well, since that stuff is common (it's even in your floor cleaner) and you don't have to go to the Moon for it. Look up aneutronic fusion.

Let's not get the cart to far ahead of the horse. Fusion with He-3. I don't see fusion with Hydrogen 1 or Hydrogen 2 in our near future. This concept is like a wild tiger that has to be tamed. Lots of barriers to overcome. And we can't bend the laws of physics either. I know fusion will be the ultimate power source for us (and that is somewhat of an understatement) but we must be realistic about this. It could be centuries before the tiger called fusion is finally tamed (unless, in the near future, there is a major scientific breakthrough).

It's quite an exciting prospect that there could be another space race - this has been implied for some time.
Watching the data is important.
Taking the long-view is important. Just who will have the fusion reactors ready for the He 3?
Is Ares to be trumped by commercial enterprise? Should a civilian agency be building rockets or manned technologies?
I suspect that just as China, India and Japan are not waiting, nor will we in North America.

The comment period for this story has ended.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Special coverage

Poll

Would you pay more to supersize your garbage bin?

View Results