Canstar Community News - ONLINE EDITION

SFX condo proposal not shelved yet

  • Print

The fate of a proposed condominium development on the site of the former Medicine Rock Café remains in limbo.


Developers Norm and Peggy Van Elslander have proposed demolishing the former cafe and and building a multi-unit condo complex on the site.


The Van Elslanders submitted a plan to the RM’s council to build a 54-unit complex on the property last September.


Councillors rejected the plan at a public hearing last November, saying they felt the development was "too large and too intrusive to the existing ambience of the village," according to minutes of the meeting.


Winnipeg’s LM Architectural Group revised the original condo plan and presented a second plan that included 60 units.


A second public hearing for the revised plan was held on May 9. Several residents spoke out in opposition to the application.


At a May 22 council meeting, councillors voted against a second reading of the rezoning application that is required in order for the condo development to proceed.


Representatives from the architectural firm and Stevenson Advisers, a company offering land development services, met with the RM’s environmental development committee on July 11 to discuss the community’s concerns and ways of dealing with them. The developers later said in an email they are prepared to reduce the number of units to 40 and to meet the municipal height restrictions.


The Van Elslanders attended an Aug. 21 meeting of council at which time Peggy Van Elslander indicated the couple still wants to continue with the condo plan. They did not respond to requests for an interview.


The councillors now have to decide whether the development requires approval of a rezoning or conditional use application. They deferred a decision on the matter until a Sept. 11 meeting.


Another public hearing will be required and councillors could use a development agreement to ensure that the project meets their specifications.


Area resident Dwayne Clark, who lives near the site, said he thinks council should reject the new application.


"This proposal has been turned down twice already," he said.


Clark and wife Pamela moved to a property in the RM of St. Francois Xavier next to an oxbow lake almost three years ago. Even though the house they bought needed some attention, they wanted to raise their four children in the country.


"I’ve always liked this area," Clark said.


They are now sharing their renovated house with the guests who come to stay at their Assiniboine Trail Guest House. "We’ve had a really successful year," Clark said.


The Medicine Rock Café was already closed when the Clarks bought their house, but they thought it could reopen as a restaurant or that someone might renovate it for use as a private residence.


"It’s a beautiful building," he said.


At the public rezoning hearing last November, Clark presented a petition signed by 200 local residents opposing the development.


Clark said he had no problem collecting signatures on the petition.


"I just wanted people to see and know what was going on," he said.


In his presentation, Clark pointed out that the revised development proposal had a higher number of units than the first proposal did.


"The architect’s plan looks like something that you’d see built in St. Vital," he said.


Clark said he’s not against development, but wants to preserve the beauty of the area. He has suggested using the cafe building as an interpretive centre.


Reeve Roger Poitras said the municipal government could not afford to expropriate the property.


"The cost would be at least one year’s general tax revenue," he said during the Aug. 21 council meeting.

 

andrea.geary@canstarnews.com

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Readers' Choice Awards

Best Of Winnipeg Readers Survey

See the results of the 2014 Canstar Community News Best of Winnipeg Readers' Survey.

View Results

This Just In Twitter bird

Poll

The forecast says we're going to get a blast of warm weather, but we all know what's coming. Are you ready?

View Results