Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Plan sees CP yards as rail estate
Douglas Village would redraw map
The tracks that divide Winnipeg could become a ribbon of parkland and trails that form the backbone of an innovative new neighbourhood for 8,000 people.
Douglas Village is a conceptual design created last year by University of Manitoba graduate Don Reimer as part of his professional architecture degree coursework through the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada. Reimer's work is the first detailed plan for what the 86-hectare marshalling yards could be if the land was available for redevelopment.
"I think Winnipeg is viewed as a city without a vision," said Reimer, who works full-time for Nejmark Architect in Winnipeg. "We do things because we like things that are economically sound right now without necessarily thinking of the future. But there are times when we surprise everyone, with The Forks, for example."
Reimer envisions a compact, dense neighbourhood where services such as doctors' offices, shops and schools are within walking distance and where middle- and upper-class homes are nestled in with affordable units of all types -- co-ops, row houses, apartment buildings, seniors units and more traditional single-family houses.
Reimer used the tracks as the spine of the design, creating a central pedestrian path and through roads that mirror the curve of the existing tracks. Parts of the iconic Arlington Bridge, now 100 years old, could be reused in new pedestrian crossings and plentiful public art would remind visitors of the land's 130-year history as a major railway transportation hub.
Light industrial businesses would be located around the periphery of the yards, buffered by a strip of green space, and commercial and residential development would be located in the core of the neighbourhood.
The design even includes land for community gardens, a railway museum, a restaurant district, a hotel and daycares co-located with schools.
The CP main line presents one of the biggest challenges to redevelopment. Relocating it likely means moving several spur lines, and involves far more money and hassle than the already-mammoth task of moving the railway yards. Leaving the main line in place, though, means the city would still need to spend money on a series of underpasses and bridges.
Reimer suggests putting the main line underground, an admittedly large undertaking.
Since trains are the historic life of the city, another option, said Richard Milgrom, city planning professor at the University of Manitoba, could be leaving it in place and building around it, like Toronto when it developed the mixed-income neighbourhood near the St. Lawrence Market next to the Via Rail line.
Key to redeveloping the yards, especially in a slow-growth city where suburban development has historically eclipsed new projects in the core, is ensuring a new neighbourhood contributes to what's already on either side. That includes historic Selkirk Avenue, which is already struggling to keep businesses and could be further cannibalized by another nearby commercial district.
"Planners need to consider not just what's on the rail yard but what's beyond that, how these things blend together," Milgrom said. "How are we improving existing neighbourhoods by building on this land?"
maryagnes.welch@freepress.mb.ca
RETHINKING THE RAIL YARDS
IT'S a huge parcel of land -- 195 hectares, including the Weston Shops -- and redeveloping them could transform the city.
What would you like to see built there? Housing? Shops? Community gardens? A water park?
Come to the Free Press News Café and get creative. You'll have a chance to discuss the issue, hear from some experts and even sketch the outline of a new neighbourhood. You can start now by downloading a map of the area posted on our website.
When: Tuesday, July 31, 6 p.m.
Where: Free Press News Café, 237 McDermot Ave. in the Exchange District.
Who: Everyone. University of Manitoba city planning Prof. Richard Milgrom and Social Planning Council of Winnipeg executive director Dennis Lewycky will kick off the discussion.
More information: wfp.to/offtherails
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 30, 2012 B1
More Off The Rails
- Back to Top
- Return to Off The Rails
More Off The Rails
(7 of 16 articles for this year)
Video North Enders have their say
07/23/2012 1:00 AM 0Poll
Most Popular Off The Rails
- The right track for renewal: Moving Winnipeg's inner-city rail yards
- Rail yard redevelopment would bring density, investment and revenue
- Remediating old rail yards cheaper, easier than you think
- Summit comes up with creative ideas to redevelop CP Rail’s central yards
- Plan sees CP yards as rail estate
- Slideshow: The CP Rail yards over the years
- Local ideas for rail change
- Yards of Reports
- Your Turn: Share your vision for the rail yards
- CP won't sell yards, Katz says
- Rail yard redevelopment would bring density, investment and revenue
- The right track for renewal: Moving Winnipeg's inner-city rail yards
- Slideshow: The CP Rail yards over the years
- Remediating old rail yards cheaper, easier than you think
- CP won't sell yards, Katz says
- Local ideas for rail change
- North Enders have their say
- Plan sees CP yards as rail estate
- A lack of locomotivation
- Your submissions: Readers' visions for the rail yards
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.