The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

MLB gives Ortiz hit instead of error, ending Darvish no-hit bid 2 innings earlier

  • Print

Yu Darvish's recent no-hit bid now officially ended in the seventh inning, not the ninth.

Major League Baseball overturned a disputed scoring decision from Friday night's game between the Texas Rangers and Red Sox. Acting on an appeal by Boston slugger David Ortiz, MLB changed an error in the seventh to a single on a high fly that dropped untouched between fielders.

Ortiz said Wednesday that he wouldn't have appealed the play if it had been a no-hitter. Darvish had a perfect-game bid going until the ruling that attracted attention all across the majors.

With Darvish's no-hit bid intact, Ortiz grounded a two-out single in the ninth inning.

"I complain about (it) because it was going to be a second hit, but that was going to be the only hit of the game, I wouldn't bring it up," Ortiz said.

The pitcher wasn't concerned about the change.

"We won that game," Darvish said through a translator. "Whether it was a one-hitter or two-hitter, we won the game. That's something that happened in the past. The only thing I care about is the win."

MLB confirmed the scoring change Wednesday. But, as is routine on the numerous scoring appeals each week, the league didn't provide an explanation for the reversal.

Veteran outfielder Alex Rios and 20-year-old second baseman Rougned Odour, playing his second major league game, both were in position to catch the popup in the seventh. Instead, Rios suddenly slowed and Odor made a late lunge. The ball fell to the ground untouched between them.

"Of course it was an error," Texas manager Ron Washington said. "It's an error. It's an out. It's not a ball that somebody (dived) for and missed. That's an out. It was misplayed so it's an out."

Ortiz obviously felt differently about the decision.

"It's a play that everybody knows once they saw it," he said. "The whole controversy started when they figured he was about to pitch a no-hitter. It's not the first time we've seen that play."

Red Sox manager John Farrell sided with his player.

"I thought it was a hit in the moment and upon further review obviously they change it, so in the end I think the right call has been made," he said.

Official scorer Steve Weller, in his 20th season working MLB games, charged Rios with an error. While that ended a perfect game, Darvish's no-hit bid was still intact.

Weller made a judgment call that Rios, with normal effort, could have made a routine catch.

"I don't think there's a lot of argument about that," Weller told a pool reporter after the game.

Even Ortiz acknowledged that the ball should have been caught. Rios also didn't dispute the error.

Weller watched numerous replays and conferred with Elias Sports Bureau, the sport's longtime record-keeper. He cited MLB rules that a ball doesn't have to be touched to be an error. If a fly ball drops to the ground, the official scorer can charge an error if, in his judgment, the outfielder "making ordinary effort would have caught" it.

Once Ortiz got the single in the ninth, the slugger decided to appeal the play in the seventh.

Darvish, who had his scheduled start on Wednesday pushed back to Friday, even joked about the incident.

"If that error, or the error that became a hit in the seventh inning, if that would have been decided a hit during the game I would probably have to pitch today," he said. "So it would probably help my career not to throw that many pitches if it had been decided during the game."

He then jokingly thanked Big Papi.

"I wanted to appreciate Ortiz," he said with a laugh.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Winnipeg Cheapskate: Cheap summer weekends

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Challenges of Life- Goose Goslings jump over railway tracks to catch up to their parents at the Canadian Pacific Railway terminalon Keewatin St in Winnipeg Thursday morning. The young goslings seem to normally hatch in the truck yard a few weeks before others in town- Standup photo- ( Day 4 of Bryksa’s 30 day goose project) - Apr 30, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • Aerial view of Portage and Main, The Esplanade Riel, Provencher Bridge over the Red River, The Canadian Museum for Human Rights and The Forks near the Assiniboine River, October 21st, 2011. (TREVOR HAGAN/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) CMHR

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Who are the real Bombers?

View Results

Ads by Google