Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Outraged players, fans dump on ump
Men in blue hearing it after mysterious call in Atlanta
ATLANTA -- The NFL replacement refs are not there to kick around anymore.
Not to worry.
A familiar target has emerged.
Instead of guys wearing stripes, it's the men in blue.
Major League Baseball found itself embroiled in another post-season maelstrom over umpires -- and renewed calls for increased use of instant replay -- after a disputed infield fly call led to mayhem in the stands in the one-game, winner-take-all playoff in Atlanta.
The St. Louis Cardinals defeated the Braves 6-3 on Friday, advancing to the division series against the Washington Nationals. But this landmark game -- the debut of the wild-card playoff under baseball's expanded post-season format -- will long be remembered for a ruling by Sam Holbrook in the eighth inning.
Andrelton Simmons hit a pop fly that dropped safely in left field after a mix-up between two fielders, either able to have caught the ball easily. Holbrook ruled the batter out anyway under the infield fly rule. The fans at Turner Field went nuts, littering the field with beers cups, buckets of popcorn and anything else they could get their hands on, leading to a scary, 19-minute delay.
Almost as quickly as the field was covered in trash, there were immediate comparisons to the NFL's referee debacle. Someone at Turner Field even held up what was apparently a hastily crafted sign: "Replacement Umps??"
Former Braves outfielder Dale Murphy, who won two MVP awards in the 1980s, weighed in on Twitter.
He wasn't alone.
"Oh my," Murphy wrote. "Not believing this. Calls an infield fly when the ball is almost on the ground?"
"One game elimination and a call like that is made? Inexcusable," Oakland Athletics pitcher Brandon McCarthy said.
"Wow. Infield fly on a 200 footer," added Arizona pitcher Daniel Hudson.
Even out in San Francisco, where the Giants host Cincinnati in Game 1 of the NL's other division series on Saturday, the call in Atlanta had everyone's attention.
"I didn't know it was an infield fly," reliever Jeremy Affeldt said. "I don't even know how an infield fly is an infield fly. I don't know where the line's drawn."
Maybe that's even an issue for some folks at MLB.
Baseball's official Twitter site had a sentence in its profile that said "We don't understand the infield fly rule, either." Sure, it was just somebody's attempt at humour, but that sentence was quietly zapped from the site as the trash was flying in Atlanta.
Indeed, this is no laughing matter, especially for the Braves.
Their season is over.
"This was an exciting game," said Joe Torre, who played and managed for both the Braves and Cardinals and now serves as MLB's executive vice-president of baseball operations. "I'm sorry about the controversy. It's certainly not something we ever plan on."
This certainly wasn't the first time the umps have been at the centre of a call that might've gone a different way with instant replay -- though, in this case, Holbrook said he was "absolutely" sure he made the right ruling even after looking at the video.
From Doug Eddings' noncall on an apparent strike three by the Los Angeles Angels in the 2005 AL championship series to Tim McClelland blatantly missing a clear double play by those same Angels in the 2009 ALCS to Ron Kulpa blowing a tag on a Cardinals runner in last year's World Series, this has become a rite of October.
-- The Associated Press
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 7, 2012 B3
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Baseball
- Back to Top
- Return to Baseball
More Baseball
(1 of 40 articles for today)
Fernandez gets another no-decision in Marlins' 7-3 loss to Phillies
11:00 PM 0Poll
Most Popular Baseball
- Rain cancels game between Goldeyes and Amarillo
- Dickey's wobblers save Jays
- Goldeyes shuffle roster on road trip
- Goldeyes general glowing
- Fish thrust into eye of storm for opener
- St. Louis rookie Shelby Miller chased in 6th inning, takes loss as Padres beat Cardinals 4-2
- Nationals reliever Ryan Mattheus breaks pitching hand punching locker following rough outing
- White Sox chairman Reinsdorf recommends family succession plan that includes selling team
- 2013 Goldeyes schedule
- Giants pitcher Affeldt reveals in new book how he overcame homophobia, no longer judges others
- Goldeyes general glowing
- Goldeyes shuffle roster on road trip
- Fish thrust into eye of storm for opener
- Rain cancels game between Goldeyes and Amarillo
- Fish prepping for opener in Texas
- Goldeyes send pair of players packing
- Goldeyes sign rookie pitcher, release Osuna
- Elbow surgery for Blue Jays pitcher
- Dickey's wobblers save Jays
- Manitoba at the bat
- Goldeyes' hurler living the dream, even in nightmare of first pro outing
- Goldeyes general glowing
- Goldeyes shuffle roster on road trip
- Goldeyes release pair of pitchers
- Rift repaired, Little League and family of founder Carl Stotz collaborate on museum exhibit
- Fish thrust into eye of storm for opener
- Trial where ex-wife wants Dodger divorce settlement thrown out ends; ruling expected in summer
- Back at ballpark after being hit by line drive, pitcher JA Happ says 'I feel really fortunate'
- Rain cancels game between Goldeyes and Amarillo
- Fish prepping for opener in Texas
- Rockies INF D.J. LeMahieu works his way back to the big leagues, LHP Francis goes on 15-day DL
- Jays finally punch back
- 2013 Goldeyes schedule
- Marlins-Twins game postponed by a day due to bad weather; Minnesota has 4th washout in 9 days
- Happy campers
- Goldeyes' hurler living the dream, even in nightmare of first pro outing
- MLB suspends, fines umpires after acknowledging 2nd mistake in 2 days
- Goldeyes release pair of pitchers
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.