August 28, 2016

cloudy

Winnipeg
14° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Golf

Penalty protest risk to Tiger's rep with peers

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 17/9/2013 (1075 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

ATLANTA -- Five wins. No majors.

Yet the number that might resonate most for Tiger Woods in 2013 is three, as in rules violations.

Tiger Woods protested his two-shot penalty at last week's BMW Championship.

CHARLES REX ARBOGAST / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES

Tiger Woods protested his two-shot penalty at last week's BMW Championship.

Two were his responsibility for not knowing the rules.

He took relief from an embedded lie in a sandy area covered with vines in Abu Dhabi -- except a free drop was not allowed in the sand. The two-shot penalty assessed after his round caused him to miss the cut.

Far more memorable was the Masters. Woods took an improper drop after his wedge into the 15th green rattled off the pin and into the water. The mistake was not discovered until after he signed his card -- and after he said in an interview he purposely dropped it a few paces behind the original spot. Augusta National docked him two shots, but didn't disqualify Woods because the club knew there was a question about the drop and chose not to talk to him before he signed his card.

It was the third violation that was the most troubling. And oddly enough, Woods knew the rule.

He just didn't think he violated it.

In the trees behind the first green Friday at the BMW Championship, he was removing a small branch in front of his golf ball when the ball moved ever so slightly. Woods immediately stopped what he was doing. He was certain the ball only oscillated. He went on to make double bogey.

Then his luck got worse. A PGA Tour Entertainment videographer just happened to capture the moment without knowing what he had. It was shipped to the office in Florida, along with the rest of his footage, where an editor detected the ball moving and notified the tour.

And this is where it gets messy.

Video evidence clearly shows the ball moved -- not more than a half-dimple at most, but it moved -- which violates Rule 18-2a. Slugger White, vice-president of rules and competition for the PGA Tour, had to look only once to see that it moved. Woods said he watched it "again and again and again" and he saw it only wobble.

The evidence was obvious enough that White assessed him two shots.

"It was pretty clear to me," White said.

Woods stood his ground a day later, saying it only oscillated. From his vantage point, crouched over the top of the ball, that's probably what it looked like. From the camera angle provided to the tour, it moved.

Imagine if White had sided with Woods, did not give him the penalty, and the video was shown on TV the next day. This would not be called "protecting the field." This would be called "protecting Tiger." It would have made Woods look even worse.

Not that he came out of this one looking much better.

Grousing didn't make Woods' case any stronger, especially in light of the video evidence. If anything, he allowed his integrity on the golf course to be questioned. That was never (or rarely, anyway) the case as he assembled perhaps the greatest career in PGA Tour history -- 79 wins, 14 majors, 10 money titles (including this year).

But now he risks losing the locker-room.

A few players privately mocked him during the final round at Conway Farms. "Oscillation" became a punch line.

Was it worth it?

Whether he likes it or not, Woods is held to a different standard, just as Greg Norman, Tom Watson, Jack Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer were before him in the television era. He gets more attention. He draws the largest crowds. He's on TV more. His every move is scrutinized.

Imagine how the other 69 players at the BMW Championship would have felt had they saw the video and learned Woods was not penalized.

Did Woods gain an advantage by his ball moving so slightly that he didn't notice? Of course not. But the Rules of Golf are not based on an advantage. In this case, it's abiding by one of the fundamental principles of the game -- play the ball as it lies.


-- The Associated Press

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Scroll down to load more

Top