Sunny

Winnipeg, MB

4°c Sunny

Full Forecast

Ice Hockey

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Team Canada has bizarre goal wiped out vs. Finland for high-sticking

Posted: 02/16/2014 11:43 AM | Comments: 0

Last Modified: 02/16/2014 3:14 PM

Advertisement

  • Print
The puck falls behind Finland goaltender Tuukka Rask and over the goal line knocked off the top of the net by Canada in the first period of a men's ice hockey game at the 2014 Winter Olympics, Sunday, Feb. 16, 2014, in Sochi, Russia. The goal was disallowed after review. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

Enlarge Image

The puck falls behind Finland goaltender Tuukka Rask and over the goal line knocked off the top of the net by Canada in the first period of a men's ice hockey game at the 2014 Winter Olympics, Sunday, Feb. 16, 2014, in Sochi, Russia. The goal was disallowed after review. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

SOCHI, Russia - Another day at the Sochi Winter Olympics, another questionable disallowed goal.

One day after Russia had a goal taken away because the net was slightly off its moorings, Canada had a bizarre goal wiped out in its game against Finland.

Alex Pietrangelo's shot hit a Finnish player's stick, popped into the air and landed on the top of the net behind goaltender Tuukka Rask. Rick Nash swatted the top of the net to dislodge it.

It wasn't clear whether Patrick Sharp batted it out of the air or just took a swing, but it ended up in the net at 13:44 of the first period.

Officials conferred and reviewed the play, ultimately determining it was no goal because of a high-stick.

IIHF rules state that a goal is disallowed "if an attacking player contacted the puck with the stick above the crossbar."

The IIHF case book addresses the situation, saying "if the player knocked the puck off without a high-sticking infraction and he was not in the goal crease at the moment the puck dropped into the crease, the goal shall be allowed."

Nash's stick had to be above the crossbar to make the play he did.

Canadian coach Mike Babcock said he did not get an explanation from the officials.

"They just waved it off," he said after the game.

But Babcock said he thought it would be waved off because "as soon as it's on top of the net, the easy way out is it's no goal."

Later in the first, Rask had to dive across the crease to cover the puck after a wraparound attempt by Jonathan Toews. It was not called a goal on the ice but reviewed anyway before it was determined the puck did not completely cross the goal-line.

Controversy reigned Saturday when a goal by Russia's Fedor Tyutin was called off after the net was off its moorings behind U.S. goaltender Jonathan Quick. It was a questionable enough decision that the IIHF put out a statement to confirm officials made the correct call.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.