Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Red mittens help put 2010 Games in black

  • Print

VANCOUVER -- Red mittens and the taxpayers who wore them helped the Vancouver 2010 Olympics break even.

The Vancouver Olympic organizing committee released its final financial report Friday, saying that in the end the Games cost $1.88 billion to stage and reaped that much in revenue.

"We made a promise and we repeated it many times that we would not leave behind a bad result and an unpleasant financial surprise at the end of the Games," said John Furlong, the chief executive officer of the organizing committee, told a news conference on Friday.

"It wasn't easy."

While 91 per cent of the budget came from the corporate sector, taxpayers footed $187 million of the operational bill, and the cost of the venues at $603 million.

The committee's final figures were up $250 million from their original 2007 business plan.

Organizers did raise more money than planned -- $54.6 million worth of merchandise, including 3.5 million pairs of Olympic red mittens and $269.5 million worth of tickets. They also used $730 million of domestic sponsorship money.

But costs also escalated, with the final line item for services and operations ringing it at over $100 million more than budgeted in 2009.

Organizers repeatedly blamed the recession for the increase in their costs, but transportation and accommodation costs were a challenge long before the global economic collapse.

According to briefing documents obtained under the Access to Information Act, organizers first told the federal government about a potential funding shortfall in the spring of 2008.

The committee acknowledged Friday that the success of the Games came from the fact that the federal and provincial governments opened their wallets a little more than they'd originally planned.

The federal government gave an additional $30.7 million for translation, the Paralympics and Own the Podium, while the provincial government contributed an additional $49.5 million to the organizing committee directly and then spent more for the torch relay, opening ceremonies and the look of the Games.

But Furlong said all the investments were targeted to make sure that Canadians got as much out of the Games as they could.

"There was an opportunity to take something that we were doing to a completely different level," he said.

The International Olympic Committee also stepped in with an extraordinary commitment, as Vancouver organizers had developed their initial budget on the belief there would be more international sponsors than eventually materialized.

Neither Vancouver organizers nor the IOC would disclose how much the contribution was in the end.

A comparison of budgeted figures from 2009 and the final numbers suggests the contribution was $9 million, far less than the maximum $22 million the IOC had suggested it would pay.

The Olympics were a success but far greater steps could have been taken to ensure transparency in their budgets, said Kathy Corrigan, the provincial New Democrats' Olympic critic.

"It was a great event, but the question is whether or not the taxpayers of British Columbia were well served and whether it was a good investment," she said.

"The only people who can decide on that are the taxpayers themselves."

The financial report was released hours after a government report that showed the 2010 Winter Olympics have so far generated between $2 and $2.5 billion for B.C. coffers.

The PricewaterhouseCoopers study said the first three months of 2010 alone put over $862 million into the provincial economy.

-- Wire credit

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 18, 2010 D2

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

RMTC preview of Good People

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Carolyn Kavanagh(10) had this large dragonfly land on her while spending time at Winnetka Lake, Ontario. photo by Andrea Kavanagh (mom0 show us your summer winnipeg free press
  • Someone or thing is taking advantage of the inactivity at Kapyong Barracks,hundreds of Canada Geese-See Joe Bryksa’s goose a day for 30 days challenge- Day 15- May 22, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you think the Raptors can come back and beat the Nets in their playoff series?

View Results

Ads by Google