The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Blatter says video evidence should be used retrospectively to punish divers, injury fakers

  • Print

LONDON - Video evidence should be used to punish footballers who dive, fake injuries or waste time, FIFA President Sepp Blatter said on Friday.

Seeking to eradicate cheating from the game, Blatter questioned why disciplinary bodies are not using existing rules to take retrospective action.

"Video evidence can contribute greatly to fair play, provided the sport's disciplinary bodies are prepared to use it — and they should," Blatter wrote in his column in FIFA's weekly magazine.

Article 96 of FIFA's disciplinary code states that audio or video recordings are permissible to mount disciplinary cases.

"Video evidence can be used for serious breaches of the principle of fair play such as brawling, spitting at opponents, verbal insults and racist slurs, or for incorrectly awarded red or yellow cards," Blatter said. "In cases such as these we must make use of the avenues already open to us and intervene after the event if necessary.

"In this context, we should include the faking of injury, intentional diving or time wasting in our considerations."

Thierry Henry escaped action for his handball before the goal that helped send France to the 2010 World Cup instead of Ireland. FIFA said it had no legal right to consider the case under its rules.

But Blatter believes that "if the referee does not see unsporting conduct ... during the course of a match, we can come back to it later."

"I am not talking about a new technological aid to be used during matches, but about consistently applying a tool," he added.

FIFA's media department said Blatter's proposals weren't enforceable without going through committees, and were unlikely to be applied at the World Cup in Brazil.

Although technology is now allowed to instantly rule on disputed goals, Blatter does not advocate stopping matches to allow referees to defer to video replays on other disputed matters.

"If we were to permit this it would lead to a flood of appeals that would essentially destroy the game," Blatter said. "The referee's verdict must always take precedence. Once the match official hands down a decision, it must be the end of the matter."

___

Rob Harris can be reached at www.twitter.com/RobHarris .

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.