Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 28/9/2012 (1337 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
DENVER -- The suspect in the Aurora movie shooting mailed "burnt currency," along with a notebook, to his psychiatrist before the attack. He threatened a professor and was banned from a university campus before withdrawing from its neuroscience graduate program. His defence team has added a psychiatrist.
Those were the few tidbits of information in hundreds of pages of heavily-redacted court documents released Friday, which serve as the best chance the public has to understand what happened before James Holmes allegedly opened fire at a midnight screening of the new Batman movie more than two months ago.
The documents shed little light on Holmes' possible motives or whether the university ignored warning signs about him. That's partly because Arapahoe County District Judge William B. Sylvester continued to keep under seal the key documents in the case -- the affidavit that lays out prosecutors' case against Holmes, and the search warrants that allowed them to gather evidence against him.
Holmes, 24, faces 152 charges in the July 20 shooting that killed 12 people and injured 58 others.
Some of the pages are entirely blacked out. In others, Sylvester's rulings on legal disputes, references to years-old case law and even copies of newspaper articles are redacted, along with information about the investigation.
The documents do shed a little more light on one of the main disputes in the case -- Holmes' threats against a professor, possibly the university psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton, who has testified she contacted campus police after her last meeting with Holmes June 11. Fenton, who testified Aug. 30, said she went to police to gather more information and communicate her "concern."
She did not refer to her concern as a threat.
Prosecutors contended that Holmes was barred from campus after making the threats. The University of Colorado has said Holmes was denied access to nonpublic buildings on campus because he withdrew as a neuroscience graduate student, not for safety reasons.
A university spokeswoman did not return a call for comment Friday. The university has previously refused to comment on how it handled Holmes, citing a gag order Sylvester imposed. Before the gag order, university officials said their police force had no contact with Holmes and that the chief of the department knew nothing about him.
The defence team sought sanctions against prosecutors for contending Holmes had been barred from campus, arguing that the false statements could contaminate the jury pool. But Sylvester shot that down, ruling the statements were within legal bounds.
Defence attorneys issued a written statement Friday again saying the claim that Holmes was barred from campus was false and misleading.
The most legally significant disclosure Friday was the inclusion of the psychiatrist on Holmes' defence team. Holmes' attorneys have said he is mentally ill.
"This is unusual in a normal case, but not surprising in this case," said criminal trial lawyer Dan Recht, former president of the Colorado Criminal Defence Bar. "Presumably he's (the psychiatrist) the one who is going to opine on whether Holmes is insane or not.
"It's a foregone conclusion that the defence will plead not guilty by reason of insanity."
Prosecutors suggested Holmes was angry at the failure of a once-promising academic career and stockpiled weapons, ammunition, tear gas grenades, and body armour as his research deteriorated and professors urged him to get into another profession.
-- The Associated Press