Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Getting rid of chemical weapons is never simple

Past experience in Libya, Iraq will shape Syria plan

  • Print

When Moammar Gadhafi renounced chemical weapons in 2003, the Libyan dictator surprised skeptics by moving quickly to eliminate his country's toxic arsenal. He signed international treaties, built a disposal facility and allowed inspectors to oversee the destruction of tons of mustard gas.

But Gaddafi's public break with weapons of mass destruction was not all it seemed. Only after his death in 2011 did investigators learn he had retained a large stash of chemical weapons. In a hillside bunker deep in Libya's southeastern desert, Gaddafi had tucked away hundreds of battle-ready warheads loaded with deadly sulfur mustard.

The story of Gaddafi's deception now looms over nascent efforts to devise a plan for destroying the chemical arsenal of Syrian President Bashar Assad, another strongman who, in a stunning reversal, agreed in principle last week to give up his stockpile under U.S. and Russian pressure.

Arms control experts say the experience of Libya and other former chemical weapons states such as Iraq could be instructive -- in ways good and bad -- as diplomats map out a path for finding, securing and destroying Syria's estimated 1,000 metric tons of chemical agents. Many also fear clearing Syria of its chemical weapons could prove to be uniquely challenging, in part because the inspectors would be dropped into the middle of a war zone.

"Never has there been an experience like this one," said Daryl Kimball, director of the Arms Control Association, a Washington-based non-profit. "With Syria, you have a country that did not even acknowledge having chemical weapons until recently. It had no intention of giving up its arsenal until there was a threat of military force. The schedules are being accelerated. And there's a civil war going on."

The task of eliminating weapons as dangerous as sarin or VX can be onerous even in the best of circumstances. The United States, which agreed 20 years ago to eliminate its vast, Cold War-era stockpile, still has not completed the task despite spending billions of dollars on state-of-the-art incinerators. Russia, too, is years behind schedule in eliminating an arsenal that once contained 40,000 metric tons of toxic compounds. A handful of other countries, including Japan, India and Albania, have also destroyed their chemical arsenals.

Yet weapons experts point to the successes in Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and, ultimately, in Libya -- two countries in which inspections teams overcame obstacles on their way to destroying large chemical arsenals. Iraq's weapons programs were scrutinized by two separate UN-appointed inspections regimes, one from 1991 to 1997 and another from 2002 to early 2003, before U.S. forces invaded the country in part because of a belief Iraq still retained weapons of mass destruction.

In what was perhaps a preview of events in Syria, weapons officials in Iraq managed to complete the task in spite of local hostility and widespread chaos in a country shattered by war, said Charles Duelfer, a leader of the Iraq Survey Group, which searched for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after the 2003 invasion. The group found and secured a small quantity of abandoned and damaged chemical weapons but uncovered no evidence of ongoing programs.

"Because we had bombed the hell out of the place, the Iraqis didn't even know what their inventory was," Duelfer said in an interview. By contrast, he said, "in Syria, it will be up to the government to do a lot of the heavy lifting, including providing protection for the inspectors."

While many details for the Syrian operation have not yet been finalized, ultimate responsibility will likely fall to a UN team, which will include officials of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

The Hague-based OPCW verifies compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention, the treaty Syrian officials pledged to sign last week. The Syrian government, prodded by its ally Russia, acknowledged its chemical stockpile and promised full transparency in an apparent bid to avert a U.S. military strike over last month's alleged sarin gas attack in the suburbs of Damascus, the country's capital. The Obama administration says the attack is responsible for the deaths of more than 1,400 civilians.

The OPCW, which maintains permanent teams of inspectors as well as experts in the science of destroying chemical weapons, was tapped in 2004 to oversee the dismantlement of Libya's chemical stockpile, which at the time was estimated to include nearly 25 metric tons of mustard gas in addition to ordnance, manufacturing facilities and some 1,400 tons of chemical precursors.

-- Washington Post

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 15, 2013 A4

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Mia Rabson breaks down the federal budget

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A monarch butterfly looks for nectar in Mexican sunflowers at Winnipeg's Assiniboine Park Monday afternoon-Monarch butterflys start their annual migration usually in late August with the first sign of frost- Standup photo– August 22, 2011   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • horse in sunset - marc gallant

View More Gallery Photos


Do you think the Jets will win Game 4 on Wednesday?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google