The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Jury finds Tampa mom guilty of killing her 2 teens; gets 2 life terms

  • Print

TAMPA, Fla. - Jurors in the murder trial of a mother who fatally shot her two teenage children had to decide between two scenarios: the prosecution's argument that Julie Schenecker knew what she was doing when she aimed a .38-calibre handgun loaded with hollow-point bullets at her children's heads; or the defence's explanation that the former military linguist was legally insane at the time.

After two weeks of lengthy testimony, it took the jury less than two hours to convict the 53-year-old of first-degree murder in the January 2011 killings. She was sentenced soon after to two life terms.

Schenecker, dressed in a grey suit and pink button-down shirt, began to cry after the verdict was announced. But before she was fingerprinted and led away, she turned to the courtroom to utter the only words the public would hear from her.

"I apologize for what happened, what I did," she said, crying. "I take responsibility. I was there. I know. I know I shot my son and daughter. I don't know why but I have time to try to understand that."

In the rambling statement, there was one person Schenecker didn't address specifically or apologize to by name: her ex-husband Parker Schenecker, father of the slain 13-year-old Beau and 16-year-old Calyx.

If Parker Schenecker noticed that, he didn't mention it when he talked to the news media in the courthouse following the trial.

"Today's decision for many reasons gives my family a great relief," he said.

Six expert witnesses for the defence had described Schenecker as a mentally ill woman with bipolar disorder, depression and psychotic episodes.

But prosecutor Jay Pruner spent his closing arguments describing a calculating woman who plotted to buy the gun, waited three days for a background check and detailed her thoughts about the killings in a journal beforehand.

She killed the children, he said, because she was angry at her husband, Parker Schenecker — a career military man who was deployed in the Middle East when the killings took place. Pruner said Schenecker was angry that her husband had left her in a rehab facility over Thanksgiving and that he wanted to curtail her drinking.

Throughout the trial, Pruner relied on Schenecker's journals as evidence of premeditation.

"I could have done this anytime," Schenecker wrote to her husband. "But luckily you weren't here. I might have taken you out too. That would have been a crying shame."

Pruner added his own opinion: "What does that tell you? It not only tells you about the anger and resentment she has but it tells you, ironically, that Parker Schenecker was probably safer in the Middle East than he was in a bed next to her."

Parker Schenecker sat in the courtroom for all of the testimony, and testified twice — once for the prosecution and once for the defence.

He showed little emotion throughout the trial, except for a few wan smiles when talking about his children while on the witness stand. He sat next to his mother during the trial, while Julie's family sat on the other side of the courtroom, behind the defence table.

The couple, who had been married for 20 years, divorced in 2011 following the shootings.

Both Pruner and defence attorney Jennifer Spradley agreed that Julie Schenecker intended on killing herself, but took too many pills and drank, then passed out before she could shoot herself.

Spradley maintained that Schenecker was suffering from a psychotic episode around the time she bought the gun and shot her children.

"If her thinking was rational and logical, she would have made a different decision," Spradley said during her closing argument. "A healthy Julie Schenecker would have never shot her children."

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Glenn January won't blame offensive line for first loss

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A young goose gobbles up grass at Fort Whyte Alive Monday morning- Young goslings are starting to show the markings of a adult geese-See Bryksa 30 day goose challenge- Day 20– June 11, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • A gaggle of Canada geese goslings at Woodsworth Park in Winnipeg Monday- See Project Honk Day 05- May 07, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should the city grant mosquito buffer zones for medical reasons only?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google