NEW YORK -- With the ever-present buzz of cultural panic about young people, especially young women, having sex, you'd be forgiven for thinking we're living in the midst of some kind of sexual health pandemic, with our high schools and even junior high schools overflowing with the swollen bellies of pregnant teenagers. The reality, according to a Centers for Disease Control report released last week, is that the teen birth rate has plunged downward yet again, falling six per cent in the U.S. between 2011 and 2012. It has never been lower, as least not in the 73 years the government has been tracking it.
Prior to the current plummet, which started in 1991, the lowest teen birth rate since the government started collecting data in 1940 was in 1945, when it was 51.1 births per 1,000 girls ages 15-19. It's now at 29.4 births per 1,000 girls. In the 1950s, the favourite "good old days" era of conservatives, the teen birth rate was three times what it is now, reaching a peak of 96.3 per 1,000 in 1957.
So what's changed? It certainly wasn't teen-agers en masse decided to stop having sex. Teen sex rates have stayed about the same since 2002. Abortions for teenagers haven't gone up, either. John Santelli, a professor of population and family health at Columbia University, attributes the change to a greater emphasis on getting effective contraception to teens, especially long-acting methods such as the IUD.
It's important not to overlook the role that sex education plays in all this. As Tara Culp-Ressler at ThinkProgress points out, teen birth rates vary wildly by state, with conservative states having a higher rate. The state of California is perhaps the most stunning example of how swiftly things can change, going from more than 70 births per 1,000 girls to 28 since 1991, in no small part because of aggressive sex education and family planning programs. Teens simply do better if they're given the tools to stay safe when they do have sex and don't do as well with the "just say no" message.