August 20, 2017


24° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Film fans wait no more

Examination of Beckett's only movie a love letter to avant-garde cinema

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/11/2016 (275 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

It sounds like the fantasy love child of a critical theorist and a serious cineaste: a film project written by Samuel Beckett, the absurdist playwright and author of Waiting for Godot; helmed by Alan Schneider, an important director of 20th-century theatre; produced by Barney Rosset, a daring publisher of banned and avant-garde works; shot by Boris Kaufman, cinematographer for French master Jean Vigo (and younger brother of pioneering Soviet filmmaker Dziga Vertov); and enacted by the self-referential silent-era star Buster Keaton.

This film actually was made, in 1965, under Beckett’s audaciously minimalist title Film. Modernist Dream Team notwithstanding, the production was disastrously difficult and the resulting 22-minute piece, an exploration of what Beckett called "the agony of perceivedness," is classed by most critics as a fascinating failure.

Milestone Film and Video</p><p>Buster Keaton (sitting) wasn’t the first choice to star in the film.</p>

Milestone Film and Video

Buster Keaton (sitting) wasn’t the first choice to star in the film.

Notfilm, Ross Lipman’s "kino-essay" about this angsty existential undertaking, shares some of that vibe, being ambitious and odd, its dense ideas and layered visuals occasionally misfiring, but more often mesmerizing.

Lipman, a filmmaker and film restorationist, brings broad knowledge and deep-down research to this material. He pulls off revealing interviews with some of the central personalities, now in their 80s and 90s. Lipman even discovers crucial forgotten footage in rusty cans in Barney Rosset’s kitchen, as well as unearthing some rare audio of Beckett speaking during production meetings. (The tapes seem to have been recorded without his knowledge, but later released with his consent.)

Beckett hated to be photographed, filmed or taped, and he finds himself in the midst of a paradoxical project, making a film about the horror of being filmed. His script, Lipman explains, centres on a cinematic chase enacted between E (the eye of the camera, the "I" of consciousness) and O (the object of the camera, played by Keaton, perpetually fleeing with his back to us).

It makes sense that Beckett would turn to a silent-film actor for his central character. "Every word is like an unnecessary stain on silence and nothingness," he once said, and the only spoken line in Film is "Shhhh." The filmmakers tried to get Charlie Chaplin but were rebuffed, which raises some interesting questions. (The Chaplin vs. Keaton thing is the film-fan equivalent to the Superman vs. Batman thing for comic-book nuts.)

Keaton, with his stone-faced stoicism and deadpan humour, might be considered a naturally Beckettian type. Unfortunately, Keaton and the crew did not hit it off. Asked later what Beckett meant with Film, Keaton replied: "It was one of those art things. I was confused when I shot it, and I’m still confused."

And if Keaton didn’t really get the project, Lipman believes the other collaborators didn’t get Keaton, an experienced filmmaker and technical perfectionist who might have helped them through their rookie mistakes.

Lipman blends his detailed historical account of Film’s production with good gossip and gently wandering reflections on the big questions: perception, memory, mortality, time and the fundamental nature of cinema.

General viewers might find Notfilm overly long and digressive, but hardcore film fans will probably embrace it, flaws and all. By exploring the great gap between intention and achievement, by preferring valiant failure to perfection, Lipman has crafted a poignant love letter to cinema’s possibilities.

Read more by Alison Gillmor.


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more